AI Rate Professor

Culinary Arts

Tina Duke

Courses not reported · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

Avoid if you have a choice; the sole review says do it only if required and do not expect inspired teaching.

Best fit · Self Taught ProLots of homeworkBook-based testsLow engagementGrammar errorsAvoid if possible
  • Only one online review paints a very negative teaching experience.
  • and spelling errors.
  • Student reports minimal interaction and no enthusiasm for culinary management paths.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

45/100

Difficulty rating is low but the reviewer gives no grade and emphasizes lots of .

All evidence is from one online review; no in-person data.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Content appears textbook end-of-chapter style rather than advanced culinary management theory.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

85/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

and the comment warns not to expect motivation for culinary management.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

40/100

No grade outcome reported; .

Format shift

Only online evidence available.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Tagged lots of .

Format shift

Only online evidence available.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Reviewer cites uncaring minimal interaction and error-ridden assessments.

Format shift

Only online evidence available.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

70/100

model.

Format shift

Only online evidence available.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Single online , and disengaged teaching.

Main concern

Poor test quality, $100 book dependence, and minimal student interaction.

What students said

“ and spelling mistakes.”
12139
“minimal interactions with students and does not care.”
12139

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are described as cut from the $100 book chapter questions and filled with grammar errors; .

Book-derived testsGrammar and spelling errors

Assessment risk

Standard

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online tests allegedly recycle textbook questions with many grammar and spelling mistakes.

Chapter-end book questionsGrammar errors
“ and spelling mistakes.”
12139
“Everything is just the $100 book but cut up to the questions at the end of the chapter.”
12139

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you have to, do it. But don't come here expecting to be hyped to continue with culinary arts in any managerial position.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 online review only; treat all conclusions as low confidence. Credibility rating: Low.

👎 Teaching Quality

12/100

“minimal interactions with students and does not care.”

📝 Broken Assessments

20/100

“ and spelling mistakes.”

📚 Book-Only Course

25/100

“Everything is just the $100 book but cut up to the questions at the end of the chapter.”

Theme 1

⚠️ About Teaching Quality

  • minimal interactions with students and does not care
  • don't come here expecting to be hyped

Theme 2

📝

  • and spelling mistakes
  • Everything is just the $100 book but cut up to the questions at the end of the chapter

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

Only one recent online review with no grade outcome and no corroborating voices, so conclusions are highly uncertain.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

121391 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1