AI Rate Professor

Science

Mansoor Motavvef

EDGTEK111 · ENGGEN220 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Consider him for structured online classes; be cautious for .

Best fit · Self Taught ProCaringOnline savvyClear grading criteriaSelf-teach riskUnderstanding
  • Online classes praised as , and clearly structured
  • One recent in-person engineering-adjacent course felt under-prepared and self-taught
  • Small sample with sharply split format experiences

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Online exams allow two attempts and clear criteria; .

; the in-person review focuses on learning quality not free As.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

Online material is short chapters and structured quizzes; .

Online content is described as light; in-person ENGGEN220 .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

; another online and the in-person class marked it mandatory.

a single fixed policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

Two glowing online would-take-again reviews are offset by a .

Online strongly recommends him; in-person student would not endorse the class experience.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

and ; no harsh grading complaints.

Format shift

Grading praise is online-only; .

Workload

Light

70/100

Online load is short chapters, discussions, pre/post questions, and exams; .

Format shift

Workload feels light online; .

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

Excellent online lecturer and helper, but and under-prepared.

Format shift

Online teaching is praised as amazing; .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Online grades lean on pre/post quizzes and .

Format shift

; in-person assessment details are sparse.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Single recent in-person review says he cares but lectures add confusion and and labs.

Main concern

Under-prepared lectures and .

What students said

“I don't blame the professor, he really cares and wants to help. It just seems he is under-prepared to teach this class.”
ENGGEN220
“You will have to teach yourself most of this class yourself. (including labs.)”
ENGGEN220

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, and fair grading.

Main concern

Still lecture and test heavy, so staying current matters.

What students said

“One of the . and when you have an issue he will help you solve it.”
EDGTEK111
“ circumstances and allowed me needed breaks.”
16

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and short quizzes, which is relatively student-friendly; proctoring is not clearly described.

Two attempts on examsShort chapter quizzesClear grading criteriaVideo lectures

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and focuses on confusing lectures and self-taught labs.

Self-taught labsUnclear lecture support
“Every question we asked, we were met with more confusion in lecture.”
ENGGEN220
“You will have to teach yourself most of this class yourself. (including labs.)”
ENGGEN220

Online

Online grade uses 5-question pre and post checks plus 25-question exams with two attempts and easy discussions.

5 question pre and post25 question examsTwo attemptsEasy discussions
“grade is based on 5 question pre and post and 25 question exams, chapters are 5 pages at most and .”
16
“After an . and overall it's an amazing class.”
EDGTEK111

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“One of the . and when you have an issue he will help you solve it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews (2 online, 1 in person), contrasting strong online praise with a weak in-person technical course. Credibility rating: Low.

💻 Online Strength

90/100

“One of the . and when you have an issue he will help you solve it.”

🛠️ In-Person Concern

30/100

“You will have to teach yourself most of this class yourself. (including labs.)”

🤝 Caring Approach

75/100

“I don't blame the professor, he really cares and wants to help.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Online Teaching

  • His lectures are video based and he speaks sometimes as well.
  • circumstances and allowed me needed breaks.
  • and overall it's an amazing class.

Theme 2

⚠️

  • .
  • It just seems he is under-prepared to teach this class.
  • Every question we asked, we were met with more confusion in lecture.

Theme 3

📋 About Assessment

  • grade is based on 5 question pre and post and 25 question exams
  • . .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only 3 reviews across different courses and formats from 2022-2025, with strong format split and limited sample size.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

161 review
EDGTEK1111 review
ENGGEN2201 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values