AI Rate Professor

Art History

Justin Cole

ART201 · ART101 · ART111 · ART0371 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid his current studio/drawing sections if you need a fair beginner grade; older art-history style courses used to be safer but .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderPolarized by eraStudio art harshEssay-light historySlow to respond
  • Recent studio and , and strong avoid warnings.
  • Older art history and museum-style courses were often called fun, easy, and .
  • , and several students report rudeness or ignored emails.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Recent students report Cs and , while a few older students got easy As with .

Online review emphasizes hard grading; easier.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

Studio drawing is treated as high difficulty with tough critique; older art history was often called easy and fun.

Online ART101 rated hard; most .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

, and lateness or missed work has led to failing risk or drops.

Online and as mandatory; a few older comments omit it.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Stated take-again rate is only about 20%, and .

Online is negative; while older in-person history was recommend.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

, and talent-based grading make high marks hard for beginners.

Format shift

Both online and ; older in-person history felt lighter.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Older history courses had few essays and little homework; .

Format shift

Workload tone differs mainly by course type in in-person reviews; .

Teaching experience

Poor

40/100

Recent students call videos useless and ; older students called him excellent, patient, and cool.

Format shift

Online negative; and course type.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Studio work and ; few traditional exam-heavy structures except occasional art history tests.

Format shift

; older history used essays or a few tests with study guides.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

grading and weak teaching; older art history and museum courses were often highly praised and lighter.

Main concern

and weak instruction in recent .

What students said

“Grades harshly considering it's a beginners class. the .”
ART201
“After taking this class I no longer like art and feel as tho I should change my major.”
ART201
“I got an A. I had no interest in art at all... he made it a fun class.”
ART101

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

One online ART101 review calls grading unnecessarily hard and the professor rude.

Main concern

and rude tone with little support.

What students said

“Grades unnecessarily difficult for no reason and is rude.”
ART101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly projects and essays; and are not described as proctored software exams.

Essay-based assessmentOccasional tests with study guidesStudio project finals

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person art history sometimes uses a ; studio uses projects.

Study guides for examsFour essays semesterExhibition final project
“A few film responses and 3 tests. Provides study guide for exams”
ART111
“I only had 4 ”
ART101

Online

Online .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews, contrasting recent studio complaints with older art-history praise. Credibility rating: High.

⚖️

28/100

“if your not good at drawing and you turn in all your assignments (10) hell still give you a C”

🎯 Teaching Quality

40/100

“He like he should his videos seem wasteful and uneventful.”

👍 Older Course Praise

85/100

“Professor Cole is awesome!”

👎 Recommendation Rate

28/100

“ !”

Theme 1

🎨 About Studio Teaching

  • When I'd ask for help... he would literally say It's coming along then walk away

Theme 2

📜 About Art History Years

  • Easy and fun class
  • he makes the class very interesting
  • doesn't swamp you with work, 4 papers the whole class

Theme 3

❤️ About Character & Tone

  • Rude
  • Doesn't answer messages
  • He's patient and has an easy going teaching method

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty reviews from 2011–2026 with detailed recent complaints and , if polarized, evidence.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 57

Course coverage

ART2019 reviews
ART1016 reviews
ART1113 reviews
30311 review
ART03711 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 4 · Not sure yet 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1 · Rather not say 1