AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Alice Constantino

MATH · MATH112 · MATH125 · ALGEB115 · MATH115 · TRIG · MATH238 · MATH227 · ECON238 · 42 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
54.55%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Prefer another math professor for in-person classes; online may work if you are self-directed and use the video links.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHeavy Accent BarrierBoard Call AnxietyRude Classroom ToneHomework DrivenOnline More Forgiving
  • In-person reviews often cite hard-to-understand delivery, fast pacing, and public embarrassment.
  • Online sections get warmer feedback for , and .
  • Passing is possible with and , but many students still advise avoiding her.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

Homework and , and a few report easy classes, but many still struggle or fail.

Online has clearer rescue options like redos; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content level varies by course, but fast pacing and communication barriers raise the effective difficulty.

Online tools lower friction; in-person speed and accent complaints raise it.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Attendance is repeatedly treated as absent students.

In-person is strict; one online MATH238 review .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

online and highly motivated .

Online reviews are strongly positive; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Some leniency via dropped scores or redos, but others report no partial credit and rigid absence rules.

Format shift

Online redo flexibility contrasts with stricter in-person stories.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

and quizzes plus tests create steady work, not usually described as featherlight.

Format shift

Both formats mention lots of homework; online adds video-based self study.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

A minority find her funny and helpful, but .

Format shift

In-person teaching ratings drag the average down; .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

MyMathLab homework and exams in some sections.

Format shift

In-person reviews detail board work and tests; and flexible testing.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

39 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

clarity issues, forced board work, yelling, and feeling belittled.

Main concern

Classroom climate and unclear explanations make learning harder than the math itself.

What students said

“Bad professor. Messes up and forgets things like how she always forgets what chapter she left out on.”
MATH125
“She will make you go up no matter what. She makes you feel stupid and she yells at you.”
MATH112
“If you are a shy person STAY AWAY FROM THIS TEACHER!!”
MATH112

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students praise , and willingness to allow test redos.

Main concern

Still a lot of work and personally hard content even with tools provided.

What students said

“Most questions had links to Youtube video tutorials that allow you to work at your own pace.”
MATH238
“When I asked her if I can redo the .”
MATH227
“ . She loves active participation and doesn't like it when you miss class.”
ECON238

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; friendliness varies more by format than by exotic proctoring rules.

Practice Tests Before ExamsOnline Homework QuizzesSome Test Redos OnlineDrop Lowest Scores Sometimes

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person exams and quizzes follow lecture and online homework; a .

Practice Test ReviewDrop Lowest Quiz Or Exam SometimesBoard Work In Class
“She goes through a so make sure to be there when she does.”
MATH227
“ .”
MATH115

Online

and at least one case of test redos; proctoring tools are not clearly proven.

YouTube Homework LinksPossible Test RedosEmail Support
“When I asked her if I can redo the .”
MATH227
“Most questions had links to Youtube video tutorials that allow you to work at your own pace.”
MATH238

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you are a shy person STAY AWAY FROM THIS TEACHER!! She will make you go up no matter what. She makes you feel stupid and she yells at you.”

Voice snapshots generated from 42 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“She makes mistakes and keeps forgetting things. She always asks the class what chapter we left out on.”

💻 Online Experience

78/100

“Professor Constantino is AMAZING. ! I have failed statistics many times.”

😰 Classroom Climate

20/100

“She belittles students in front of the whole class and she doesn't help you like she suppossedly says she will.”

👍 Recommendation Split

42/100

“REALLY EASY PROFESSOR! JUST GO TO CLASS AND DO THE HOMEWORK.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • her accent makes it hard to understand
  • goes through lessons way too fast
  • and and even funny at times

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • There is a lot of work but
  • JUST GO TO CLASS AND DO THE HOMEWORK
  • failed her class. re-took the class with another teacher and got an A-

Theme 3

⚠️ About Character

  • was very rude
  • She will make you feel stupid and she yells at you
  • She can be a little rude when you don't understand a question

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

42

Recent reviews read by the AI

42

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

42 reviews over many years with a and a smaller but consistent online positive pattern.

Inside 42 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 52
3 out of 53
2 out of 55
1 out of 519

Course coverage

MATH11216 reviews
MATH1159 reviews
MATH2385 reviews
MATH1254 reviews
MATH2 reviews
Show 5 more courses
MATH2272 reviews
457841 review
ALGEB1151 review
ECON2381 review
TRIG1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

6

B+ 2 · B 4

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2