AI Rate Professor

Political Science

James Tucker

Courses not reported · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

experiences swing from entertaining and fair to awful teaching with a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing teacherHumor-heavy lecturesTerm memorizationFinal paper focusedTough grader risk
  • Only two reviews split between a 5 and a 1 with grades A versus F
  • Positive student likes caring humor and ; negative student says little learned and grade
  • and keyword-heavy lectures are recurring notes

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

One A and one F plus tough-grader tags show an A can require heavy analytical work on a major paper.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Difficulty ratings of 4 and emphasis on terms plus heavy thinking make the content clearly challenging.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

the political science class.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

and graded-by-few-things tags plus an .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Lectures and term memorization plus a sharp end spike.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Humor and caring connect for some, but the opposing review calls the teaching weird and ineffective.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Comments emphasize a and few graded items rather than many exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

: one student enjoyed humor and connection, another found teaching ineffective and .

Main concern

Whole grade may hinge on a , and teaching style may not land for everyone.

What students said

“He is a cool professor but awful teacher.”
28348
“your whole grade will be based on the .”
28348

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment risk centers on a and term recall rather than clearly described traditional exams.

Final paperKeyword and term focusFew graded items

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews highlight term memorization and a .

Final paperHeavy thinkingTerm keywords
“your whole grade will be based on the .”
28348
“key words and terms will be asked to be remembered”
28348

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is a cool professor but awful teacher. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 conflicting in-person reviews, capturing the polarizing teaching and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“weird way of teaching, didn't learn much at all”

👍 Split Recommendations

45/100

“Yes”

📝 High-Stakes Paper

30/100

“your whole grade will be based on the .”

😂 Lecture Style

70/100

“His lectures are also very humor related, which can make it entertains at times but also like a drag.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • try to make a type of connection with all types of students
  • humor related
  • weird way of teaching

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • whole grade will be based on the
  • Graded by few things

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Caring
  • Hilarious
  • cool professor but awful teacher

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two sharply conflicting in-person reviews from 2023-2024 limit confidence despite detailed comments.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

283482 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values