AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Kit Wong

MATH238 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Only take Kit Wong if and grind through lots of .

Best fit · Self Taught ProLots of HomeworkTest HeavySelf Study HeavyTough GraderLate Passes Help
  • Workload is heavy with and heavy reading, especially in accelerated 8-week formats
  • some praise timely emails and late passes, others say you teach yourself
  • Grades and outcomes swing from A+ to C- depending on how well students self-manage

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Grades include B and C-, tags say tough grader and test heavy, and +.

Online has both A+ and C- outcomes; the term.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

Students describe brutal pace, full-book reading, and accelerated format.

Difficulty is high in both formats; online stress is more about self-teaching.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

, while the in-person review said no, but overall policy is not flexible.

; one in-person review said no.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

About half would take again; praise for late passes and .

Online opinions split sharply; the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

and partial-credit notes exist, but many still struggle to high grades under heavy testing.

Format shift

; online still reports tough outcomes.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Repeated lots of , and comments that studying equals a full-time job.

Format shift

; online is especially self-paced overloaded.

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

Some students praise timely emails and feedback, but others say you teach yourself from the book with little live help.

Format shift

Online has the widest split from 5 to 1 quality ratings.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Test heavy tags plus exams and .

Format shift

and in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The single in-person review calls the short-term course brutal with and reading expectations.

Main concern

Brutal pace, lots of homework, and expectation to read every page and watch lectures.

What students said

“I took her 8 week course for Math 240 and it was brutal. She provided free textbook but expects for her students to read every page and watch lectures.”
MATH238

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

one student thrived with late passes and .

Main concern

and self-teaching with limited live instruction.

What students said

“workload might be overwhelming. However, she gave up to 20 late passes to complete the and .”
MATH238
“the amount of studying is equal to that of a full time job just for this class alone.”
MATH238
“This teacher throws the whole book at you and makes you study the pages for creases.”
MATH238

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are serious and paired with ; some credit for shown work and practice tests softens risk slightly.

Test HeavyPractice TestsMyOpenMath HomeworkPartial Credit on Work

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, not only final answers, under a tough test-heavy setup.

Test HeavyCredit for Work Shown
“gives credit on exams based on the work provided in .”
MATH238

Online

Online students mention practice tests and , but do not clearly prove open-book or .

Practice TestsMyOpenMath HomeworkTest Heavy
“she gave up to 20 late passes to complete the and .”
MATH238

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This class is completely online and the amount of studying is equal to that of a full time job just for this class alone.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting workload and . Credibility rating: Medium.

📚 Workload Intensity

18/100

“Lots of .”

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“I'm so glad she always responded to my emails on time and .”

⚠️ Self Study Warning

30/100

“LACCD should force teachers of MATH238 to hold video conferences Mon-Thurs to teach the material instead of students teaching themselves.”

👍 Recommendation Split

48/100

“Took her 8-week trigonometry class (MATH 240) and it was the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • expects for her students to read every page and watch lectures
  • always responded to my emails on time
  • students teaching themselves

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • it was brutal
  • workload might be overwhelming

Theme 3

📝 and Tools

  • Lots of
  • up to 20 late passes
  • throws the whole book at you

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Only four recent reviews with mixed detail and grades; but too small for high confidence.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH2384 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values