AI Rate Professor

Science

Angela Echeverri

MICRO6564 · MICROBIOLOGY · MICRO21 · MICRO026 · MICRO20 · BIO003 · MICRO · BIO3 · MICRO1 · BIO30134 · MICRO0174 · MICRO0735 · 66 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
90.48%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Take her if you will attend, use and notecards, and can handle a a solid grade.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLots of extra creditNote card on examsTest heavyCaring and flexibleLab notebook matters
  • Students often praise her as caring, flexible, and and .
  • Microbiology is still content-heavy with long tests, labs, and steady work.
  • Older harsh reviews exist, but recent comments are far more positive and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

, notecards, and flexible policies help grades, but micro still needs real study.

Online feels easier with multiple attempts; In person micro is tougher despite EC.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

; micro remains memorization-heavy and demanding.

Online reviews rate difficulty lower; In person micro is often described as tough.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Most and success.

Online still often marks attendance mandatory; In .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

Would-take-again near 90% with .

Online is almost uniformly positive; In person is positive overall with older dissent.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

, curves when close, notecards, and deadline flexibility boost outcomes.

Format shift

Both formats note EC; Online adds multiple quiz and .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Lots of , and weekly quizzes are common.

Format shift

Online students also report long timed tests and piled-up work.

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

Many call her excellent and caring; a lasting minority cite disorganization or unhelpful labs.

Format shift

Online teaching reviews are strongly positive; In person is mixed over years.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

75/100

Grades lean on exams, practicals, quizzes, and .

Format shift

Online emphasizes timed exams and quizzes; In person adds practicals and lab notebooks.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

45 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In , and notecards, though micro can be demanding and a minority call her disorganized or unhelpful.

Main concern

, and some reports of intimidation when asking questions.

What students said

“Her tests were always two portions. One, being an , and the second portion being an in .”
MICROBIOLOGY
“The exams and practicals were online and open book.”
MICRO20
“For .”
BIO3

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students love flexible timing, multiple attempts, no Proctorio, and strong pass rates with .

Main concern

Workload can pile up with long tests and many assignments if deadlines get pushed.

What students said

“ tests”
MICRO1
“Exams were 60 questions and you have the whole week to submit.”
MICRO20
“Doesn't use protractorio, trust her students.”
MICRO1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Overall exam policy is student-friendly with open-book options, notecards, and little proctoring.

Open book online examsNo ProctorioNotecard allowedMultiple attempts on quizzesLong time windowsIn-person essay portion sometimes

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person often allows notecards or and study guides.

Notecard on examsOpen book online portionEssay questionsStudy guidesExtra credit on tests
“The exams and practicals were online and open book.”
MICRO20
“For .”
BIO3

Online

, and no Proctorio.

No ProctorioMultiple attemptsLong exam windowsTimed open-style tests
“doesn't use proctorio, ”
MICRO1
“you have the whole week to submit”
MICRO20

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This teacher is amazing! tests”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (5 Online, 45 In , and older critiques. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

80/100

“Echeverri is an excellent teacher. Micro is a tough subject, but she makes it do-able.”

🎁 & Aids

85/100

“Several opportunities for . .”

📝

82/100

“Doesn't use protractorio, trust her students.”

📚 Workload

35/100

“ though but its a lot!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures are amazing
  • she tries to make the lectures funny
  • During COVID19, the professor made the class fun and understandable

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy to pass the class if you put some work into it
  • need to study hard if want to recieve a A
  • gives lots of

Theme 3

⚠️ Mixed Experiences

  • and grades materials slowly
  • I felt very intimated asking for help in this class
  • Go anywhere and

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

66

Lifetime ratings

85/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews across many years with consistent recent praise and and workload.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 535
4 out of 516
3 out of 53
2 out of 56
1 out of 56

Course coverage

MICRO2020 reviews
BIO311 reviews
MICRO15 reviews
BIO0032 reviews
MICRO01742 reviews
Show 9 more courses
MICROBIOLOGY2 reviews
01061 review
01351 review
BIO301341 review
MICRO1 review
MICRO0261 review
MICRO07351 review
MICRO211 review
MICRO65641 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

29 reported outcomes

A range

19

A+ 8 · A 11

B range

7

B+ 2 · B 5

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 3