AI Rate Professor

Economics

Morassa Danai

ECON1 · MACRO3114 · MACROMACR · MACROECON · ECON3101 · ECON2 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
28.57%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid unless you are comfortable teaching yourself economics from the book and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProReads off PowerPointSelf-teach requiredLots of homeworkClosed-book examsHeavy accent
  • Most students say lectures are PowerPoint-only and .
  • and often feel disconnected from lectures.
  • Online format can feel more manageable with Cengage work and , but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

A few students report As with , but , and low take-again sentiment.

Online comments mention and Cengage ease; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Material is standard econ, but lectures rarely clarify it, so .

; in-person difficulty ratings run higher.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

as mandatory while online has no live meetings.

; in-person is repeatedly mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Would-take-again is about 29% and the majority of comments urge students not to enroll.

One recent online recommend contrasts with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Tags and comments include Tough Grader plus hard exams that often feel unrelated to lectures.

Format shift

Online softens grades somewhat; in-person feels harsher.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of , and heavy textbook reading appear across many reviews.

Format shift

Online can feel like a ; and homework.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Dominant theme is PowerPoint reading, vague lectures, accent issues, and little real teaching.

Format shift

A few older in-person positives exist, but .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Closed-book exams and outcomes.

Format shift

Online uses Cengage quizzes and exams; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person classes are widely criticized for , and hard closed-book exams, with only a few positive outliers.

Main concern

Lectures do not prepare students for .

What students said

“Read off a powerpoint the entire semester and was very hard to understand her.”
ECON1
“She does not TEACH. She uses powerpoints for every lecture.”
ECON2
“ and doesn't teach you how to do any of it in class.”
ECON2

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections use Cengage homework, quizzes, and and some , but daily homework volume can still be heavy.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“No live meetings. Had to study on our own. The , and .”
ECON1
“Had a mountain of .”
ECON1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and often harder than lectures suggest; online uses Cengage assessments.

Closed BookNo NotesHard ExamsCengage Online Quizzes

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and frequently described as difficult and poorly aligned with lectures.

Closed BookNo NotesHard Exams
“ and no notes were allowed to be used.”
ECON1
“The .”
ECON2

Online

Online , and exams with limited live structure.

Cengage ExamsOnline QuizzesHomework Heavy
“The , and .”
ECON1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She does not TEACH. She uses powerpoints for every lecture. She is lazy and unorganized. !”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews, highlighting self-teaching burden and weak lectures. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Quality

30/100

“This professor has a very bad teaching style. Read off a powerpoint the entire semester and was very hard to understand her.”

📚

28/100

“Lectures and so be prepared to read a lot from your text book and teach yourself the material.”

🚫 Recommendation

25/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Read off a powerpoint the entire semester
  • She does not TEACH
  • her lectures are very vauge

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • and no notes were allowed
  • The

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • !
  • Didn't learn a thing from her
  • Pretty much rely on teaching yourself

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

18 reviews span many years with mixed detail; tone is consistently critical of teaching despite a few positives.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 53
3 out of 55
2 out of 53
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ECON27 reviews
ECON16 reviews
32141 review
ECON31011 review
MACRO31141 review
Show 2 more courses
MACROECON1 review
MACROMACR1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 1