AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Elizabeth Sharnazyan

STATS227 · MATH092 · MATH105 · MATH123 · MATH115 · MATH115AND125 · MATH1250369 · MATH123C · MATH125 · V10 · 32 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
30%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

Avoid unless you are ready to teach yourself and grind MyMathLab; .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing reviewsTeach yourself riskHeavy homeworkTest heavyAccent noted
  • Recent STATS227 and some MATH , and emails go unanswered.
  • Older lower-level math reviews often praise her as caring, patient, and easy to pass with homework and study guides.
  • scores from older terms.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Some older students say you pass with homework and study guides, but , and grades like C, D+, or Incomplete despite effort.

; older in-person math more often described easy-to-pass paths.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Lower-level math content is often called manageable, but stats and some algebra sections feel hard because lectures do not teach the material well.

Difficulty spikes in recent STATS227 reviews online and in person more than in older MATH105/115 comments.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

as mandatory and repeatedly say you must show up or you will fall behind.

Both formats stress showing up; a whole lesson.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Would-take-again is only about 30 percent and recent detailed reviews strongly warn students away despite older praise.

Recent online and in-person STATS227 reviews drive the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Some report and dropped tests; others call her a and harsh final grades.

Format shift

In-person older reviews lean fairer; recent .

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Frequent mentions of lots of , and .

Format shift

Heavy homework appears in both formats, especially STATS227.

Teaching experience

Average

46/100

Older students praise patience and care, while recent students describe mistakes, unreadability, technology struggles, and self-teaching.

Format shift

In-person sample is large and mixed; online recent experience is especially negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Homework plus quizzes and and graded by few things.

Format shift

Online recent stats stresses projects and tests; and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

many older students loved her support and , but recent stats and algebra students report mistakes, unreadability, and .

Main concern

Recent in-person reviewers report lecture mistakes, low speaking volume, ignored emails, and tough or .

What students said

“Just know that you have to teach yourself this class. She isn't a good professor”
STATS227
“ unless you want to teach yourself 99% of the material.”
MATH125
“ . She puts out a tough exterior but and patient”
MATH123

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

one recent STATS227 review is extremely negative with or resources, while older online math comments call her sweet and clear.

Main concern

Recent online stats section alleged , ignored emails, and 100-point projects with no instructions.

What students said

“ . , No resources, Never respond to emails, 100-point projects assigned with no instructions.”
STATS227
“Very sweet and helpful! Accent is nothing, her mothering instinct for all of her students shows how much she cares.”
MATH125

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are standard and often hard, though study guides and .

Test heavyStudy guides similar to testsMyMathLab homeworkDropped lowest test in some sections

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but some say study guides and pre-test reviews mirror the test.

Hard quizzes and testsStudy guides similar to testsReview before tests
“Her quizzes and but if you work on the study guide and .”
MATH125
“ that will be on the test”
MATH125

Online

Recent and large projects with weak instruction; older online math lacked exam detail.

Test heavyLarge projectsFew grading items
“100-point projects assigned with no instructions.”
STATS227

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . , No resources, Never respond to emails, 100-point projects assigned with no instructions.”

Voice snapshots generated from 32 reviews across math and stats, balancing older praise with recent criticism. Credibility rating: High.

⚠️ Recent Teaching Concerns

25/100

“Kept making mistakes on the exercises during lectures which dragged the classes and never learned a thing from these lectures.”

📚

30/100

“ unless you want to teach yourself 99% of the material.”

❤️ Older Student Support

78/100

“Prof Sharnazyan is probably THE most caring and supportive math teacher around!!”

👍 Recommendation Split

32/100

“ . She puts out a tough exterior but and patient with her students”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She reads off the slides and its hard to understand her.
  • she makes up for it with the clarity of her teaching style.
  • She will gladly do so and it.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Professor Sharnazyan is not for the weak.
  • With so many opportunities to get an A, the fault is on you for not passing.
  • I did all my work and did it well and she gave me a D.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Recent Experience

  • she never answered her emails, misgenders you, and then falls asleep in the middle of her lecture.
  • Does barely enough work not to get fired.
  • Most of the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

32

Recent reviews read by the AI

32

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-two reviews over more than a decade with rich detail, but opinions are polarized by era and course, so recency weighting matters.

Inside 32 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 520
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 56

Course coverage

MATH12510 reviews
STATS2276 reviews
MATH1155 reviews
MATH1054 reviews
1151 review
Show 6 more courses
MATH0921 review
MATH115AND1251 review
MATH1231 review
MATH123C1 review
MATH12503691 review
V101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 3 · A- 1

B range

5

B+ 2 · B 3

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Incomplete 2 · Not sure yet 2