AI Rate Professor

English

Emily Kemp

ENGLISH101 · ENGL21 · ENGLISH · ENGLIASL · ENG28 · ENGLISH021 · ENG21 · ENG102 · JFK2562 · ENG3247 · ENG101 · ENGLISH21 · ENG2316 · ENGLENGL · ENGLISH28 · ENG028 · ENGLI21 · CCOMP12AB · ENGLI3142 · 42 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid unless you can , and uneven organization for limited upside.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderDisorganizedPuts students on the spotLots of homeworkPolarizing and sassy
  • Many students , and embarrassing in class.
  • Workload and .
  • A minority , and rewarding if you earn her respect.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

and ; only some favored or highly engaged students call it easy.

; in-person reports are mixed but often hard work for grades.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Content is standard English reading and writing, but , and critique make it feel harder than advertised.

and writing, not introductory fluff.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

14/100

and lateness or zoning out gets public call-outs.

; online comments mark attendance no.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Only about a and and older reviews.

and across most in-person comments.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

and nitpicky critiques.

Format shift

and in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Lots of , and weekly assignment stacks are repeatedly reported.

Format shift

Online short courses pile weekly work; .

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Common themes are disorganization, off-topic talk, and disrespect, with a minority praising humor and care.

Format shift

Negative teaching tone dominates both formats, especially in person.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

40/100

, and essays drive the course more than clearly structured exams.

Format shift

Assignment-heavy pattern shows in both online weekly work and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

40 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person majority report disrespect, disorganization, public criticism, and .

Main concern

, and putting students on the spot.

What students said

“I have never been so disrespected by an instructor all my life.”
ENG101
“ ! Rude, puts people on spot, criticizes your work for the smallest things and .”
ENG101
“Amazing professor. Respect her and she will respect you as well.”
ENG21

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews range from avoid-at-all-costs to okay short-term with heavy weekly work and tough essays.

Main concern

Lots of weekly assignments and .

What students said

“The ratings speak for themselves. .”
ENG101
“Each week would consist of about 5-10 assignments (depending on length) where we read short stories and poems with .”
ENG102

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and heavy writing more than proctoring tools; .

QuizzesEssay heavyHomework heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and quizzes but do not clearly prove proctoring software or open-book policy.

Confusing testsQuizzesPublic verbal grading
“The tests didnt make sense, we didnt use the .”
ENG28
“she grades work verbally in front of entire class. She will embarrass you.”
ENG028

Online

Online students describe heavy weekly assignments and .

Lots of weekly assignmentsTough essaysExtra credit
“She was usually very lenient with but tough .”
ENG102

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! Rude, puts people on spot, criticizes your work for the smallest things and . HORRIBLE ENGLISH TEACHER.”

Voice snapshots generated from 42 reviews, highlighting tone, organization, and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“She is rude, will put you on the spot and she'll enjoy it. and will lose track of your work.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

25/100

“The ratings speak for themselves. .”

📚 Workload Load

24/100

“Each week would consist of about 5-10 assignments (depending on length) where we read short stories and poems with .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Gets off topic and very chatty but and gives plenty of feedback
  • Mrs. Kemp spends 34 of the class bragging about her life and humiliating your work

Theme 2

😤 About Classroom Tone

  • I have never been so disrespected by an instructor all my life
  • She will embarrass you
  • calls you out in front of the class if you are late to her lectures

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • she's an easy A, just keep turning in and you'll be fine
  • tough

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

42

Recent reviews read by the AI

42

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-two reviews over many years consistently flag disorganization, tough tone, and .

Inside 42 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 53
3 out of 54
2 out of 59
1 out of 515

Course coverage

ENG10113 reviews
ENG285 reviews
ENG214 reviews
ENG32473 reviews
ENGLISH1013 reviews
Show 14 more courses
CCOMP12AB1 review
ENG0281 review
ENG1021 review
ENG23161 review
ENGL211 review
ENGLENGL1 review
ENGLI211 review
ENGLI31421 review
ENGLIASL1 review
ENGLISH1 review
ENGLISH0211 review
ENGLISH211 review
ENGLISH281 review
JFK25621 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Rather not say 3