AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Gina Peterson

CD34 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid if and timely feedback; only take if you can self-manage chaos and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnorganizedTough graderSlow email replyLots of homeworkMixed due dates
  • mixed assignment lists, changing due dates, and .
  • Multiple students report ignored emails and .
  • A and available, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Grades cluster around B/C+ with ; an A is possible but requires tracking chaotic work and strict scoring.

Both online and ; only one A appears across five reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Difficulty ratings sit near average; pain comes more from organization than abstract content.

Online and in-person both rate difficulty around 3 with similar assignment chaos.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

and participation matters; only one online review said not mandatory.

In-person and as required; one online review reported optional.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Would-take-again is low (~20%) and several students explicitly say to retake with someone else or save your time.

Online has one yes and several no/ignored; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

and C+/B outcomes show strict scoring on small and .

Format shift

and in-person comments.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Lots of , and many tiny-point tasks pile up.

Format shift

; online notes participation points and group work.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Kind demeanor is noted, but unprofessional communication, chaos, and .

Format shift

Online praise for accessibility is outweighed by ignored emails; in-person focuses on disorganization.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and group projects rather than clear exams.

Format shift

; comments center on homework and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews stress disorganization, surprise added work, mixed assignment lists with another college section, and lots of .

Main concern

Constantly changing due dates and .

What students said

“The that only give you 2 points.”
CD34
“ and due date was mixed up with the other class, so everyone was turning in the wrong assignments”
CD34

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

one found her available and , and chaotic Zoom/assignment rules.

Main concern

Unanswered emails and .

What students said

“I've never met such an unprofessional professor in my life I emailed her about 2 weeks ago and she ”
CD34
“Expected a lot from us but if I had questions.”
CD34
“Changes the due date of .”
CD34

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; assessment and participation.

Unclear exam formatAssignment-driven grading

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; complaints center on homework tracking and due dates.

Homework heavy
“Hard to keep track of your assignments because she is always changing due dates and adding work unexpectedly.”
CD34

Online

Online reviews ; focus is assignments and Zoom meetings.

Zoom meetingsParticipation points
“Zoom meeting were tough.”
CD34
“Most of the as worth 0 points.”
CD34

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Plan on retaking the class with a different professor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews (3 online, 2 in , and communication. Credibility rating: Medium.

😵 Disorganization Crisis

25/100

“ and due date was mixed up with the other class, so everyone was turning in the wrong assignments”

📧 Communication Failure

20/100

“I emailed her about 2 weeks ago and she though I reminded her about it two times”

📝

28/100

“unnecessary work that only give you 2 points”

❤️ Occasional Care

55/100

“Expected a lot from us but if I had questions.”

Theme 1

📂 About Organization

  • always changing due dates and adding work unexpectedly
  • mixed up with the other class

Theme 2

⚖️ About Grades & Work

  • Lots of homework

Theme 3

📬 About Communication

  • she
  • She ignored me. Save your time.
  • always available if I had questions

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Five detailed reviews from 2019-2023 show consistent disorganization themes, but sample size is small and mixed quality scores reduce certainty.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CD345 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

2

C+ 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values