AI Rate Professor

Child Development

yesenia Beltran

CD002 · CD8 · CHD101 · CD02 · CD2 · CHD02 · M03 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
49/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you can attend every class, participate loudly, and tolerate a strict, sometimes harsh personality.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough graderParticipation mattersLecture heavyNo Canvas gradesPolarizing personality
  • Older reviews praise inspirational lectures and easy pass if you show up and participate
  • Recent reviews flag , and harsh attendance rules
  • Participation and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Many report an easy A if you participate and never miss class, but and few graded items make a high grade risky if you slip.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Content is manageable with notes and observations, but , and lecture pace add real work.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

; missing class or tardiness is a major pet peeve and can tank your grade.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

and lectures, while recent students strongly warn against her personality and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

; few graded items and late grade visibility raise the stakes.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Expect , and lecture notes; not light but not always overwhelming.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Inspirational lectures for many, but rudeness, unapproachability, and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Mix of participation, group projects, papers, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person Child Development classes with , and lectures; older cohorts loved her while newer ones report rudeness and opaque grading.

Main concern

Recent students describe rude call-outs, no Canvas grade visibility until semester end, and zero flexibility on absences.

What students said

“ . She . Very unapproachable.”
CD8
“Was not hard or tough whats so ever . She really gets into the lectures but they are NOT boring . easy A”
CD02
“ and you can't know your current grade till the end of the semester.”
CHD101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests reward careful lecture notes and participation; format is standard with .

Lecture notes for testsParticipation weightedGroup projects

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students say and participate; no detailed proctoring or open-book policy is stated.

Lecture notes for testsParticipation matters
“ .”
CD002
“all you ”
CD2

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“WOULD NOT take her ever again. She is very picky/tough grader. Very unapproachable. !”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 in-person reviews spanning 2016-2026, highlighting teaching praise versus recent rudeness and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“She's a great professor. loved all her lectures!!!!”

👍 Recommendation Split

52/100

“One of the !! I would recommend her over any teacher shes seriously the best.”

⚠️ Personality Risk

28/100

“Very rude, exposes grades. Doesn't even give me a chance to open my mouth....”

📍

12/100

“It is possible to pass her class just NEVER miss class her biggest pet peeve is tardiness and attendance”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • loved all her lectures!!!!
  • Her lectures are all inspirational
  • She can lecture nonstop!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • easy A . No way you should fail
  • She
  • you can't know your current grade till the end of the semester

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Very rude towards the class and will call you out
  • she inspired me so much
  • Very unapproachable

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

18 detailed reviews spanning 2016-2026 with consistent themes on participation and a .

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 52
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

CD025 reviews
CD24 reviews
CHD1014 reviews
CD82 reviews
CD0021 review
Show 2 more courses
CHD021 review
M031 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 2 · A 6

B range

2

B 2

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 1