AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Gohar Petikyan

MATH0358 · MATH115 · MATH0123 · MATH90 · EALG0996 · EALG0234 · MATH0428 · MATH227 · MATH125 · MATH3269 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if you can teach yourself math; online sections look especially risky based on recent reviews.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizingAccent barrierSelf-study heavyTech-challenged onlinePasses many students
  • Reviews split hard between caring easy-pass teacher and .
  • Online COVID-era sections drew harsh tech and communication complaints.
  • Homework and tests matter; and some .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

72/100

Multiple students say she is easy on tests, passes people, or that doing work yields an A if you already know material.

In-person lean easy if self-sufficient; online students still passed one B and one F amid chaos.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Content is not described as advanced, but so experienced students find it easy.

In-person difficulty mixed 1-5; online felt hard due to instruction quality.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Often listed mandatory, yet students say it is not enforced and going a few times is enough.

Online said mandatory; but is flexible in practice.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

40/100

Would-take-again about 40% with passionate fans and .

; recent online and some in-person urge finding another teacher.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

Several say she is easy on tests, helps during tests, and passes students; .

Format shift

; online includes tough grader tag and an F.

Workload

Heavy

38/100

Lots of , and test-heavy structure appear often.

Format shift

and tests.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Polarized between patient explainers and reports of .

Format shift

In-person mixed long-term; online teaching experience rated very poor.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

70/100

, and group projects; exams carry major weight.

Format shift

In-person details more complete; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and easy with notes on tests; others cite accent, fast pace, long breaks, and .

Main concern

Teaching clarity and pace vary; weaker math .

What students said

“ . .”
MATH115
“If you know that you need extra help in .”
MATH0428
“Lets ! And even puts problems on the ! !”
MATH0358

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Both online reviews rate quality 1 for weak tech , and poor communication.

Main concern

Not tech-savvy, hard to .

What students said

“she was the least tech-savvy person on earth. she would show up sleepy and you could not understand what she was saying”
MATH227
“she was NOT tech savy. students knew more about how to use HER computer.”
MATH227

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Some students report notes during tests and help if you ask; .

Notes allowed on testsHelp during testsChapter testsGroup projects

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Notes sometimes allowed on tests and she may put problems on the board or help during tests; multiple chapter tests.

Notes allowed on testsHelp during tests4 tests typicalGroup projects
“Lets ! And even puts problems on the !”
MATH0358
“She also helps you during the tests if you ask her.”
MATH227

Online

and tests feeling mismatched and hard.

Test heavy
“The homework and the classwork were completely different and I always felt lost in that class.”
MATH227

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you don't really care about learning and this class is more like a GE. You won't learn anything unless you're willing to go home & teach yourself everything.”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews (2 online, 17 in-person), highlighting polarization and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“SHE IS THE . SHE DOESNT KNOW MATH.”

👍 Supportive Fans

75/100

“Yes, she does indeed have an accent but she teaches better than most math teachers that I have seen.”

💻 Online Tech Issues

20/100

“she was NOT tech savy. students knew more about how to use HER computer.”

🅰️ Easy Pass Potential

72/100

“This teacher is amazing. She doesn't really know how to teach the class but she is really easy on the tests.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she breaks down statistics everything well
  • When she tried to lecture and " and the board
  • , and fair.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Just do what you're supposed to do & you will get an A.
  • For people who are bad at math (like me), this class is basically self study.
  • and straightforward.

Theme 3

💻 About Online Experience

  • please find another math teacher or
  • communication impossible.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

19 reviews over a long span with and polarized opinions; enough sample for a medium-confidence mixed picture.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH2274 reviews
MATH1153 reviews
MATH01232 reviews
MATH03582 reviews
MATH1252 reviews
Show 6 more courses
1251 review
EALG02341 review
EALG09961 review
MATH04281 review
MATH32691 review
MATH901 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 2 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1