AI Rate Professor

History

John Morales

CHICANO008 · CHICANO007 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Skip unless you only have the easy online option and can ignore the serious professionalism red flags.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizingEasy OnlineUnprofessional ConductBoring Lectures
  • Online review praises an easy A-plus course with real learning
  • and unprofessional for flirting with students
  • Only two reviews nine years apart make the picture unreliable

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Online student earned an A-plus in a very easy class; the detail.

Ease evidence is strongest from the single online review; .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Online student called the class very easy; in-person difficulty felt moderate and not intellectually intense.

Online evidence says very easy; and boredom.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

70/100

Online attendance was not mandatory; .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

40/100

One glowing recommend versus a serious .

Online student would take again; and was strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

A-plus online and a B in person .

Format shift

Online A-plus contrasts with an .

Workload

Light

72/100

Online student described a very easy class with no textbooks; .

Format shift

Workload comments exist only in the online review.

Teaching experience

Average

45/100

One five-star easy-learning review is canceled by a one-star unprofessional and boring in-person review.

Format shift

Online praise and .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews .

Format shift

Neither format describes assessment structure in detail.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One student found the in-person class boring and labeled the instructor unprofessional for flirting with female students.

Main concern

Unprofessional behavior and low teaching energy in the only in-person review.

What students said

“Instructor very boring. He flirts with the girls in the class, he is very unprofessional.”
CHICANO008

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

One student found CHICANO007 very easy yet still educational and .

Main concern

Single old online review with .

What students said

“Very easy, but you still learn a lot. .”
CHICANO007

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

.

Online

Online .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Instructor very boring. He flirts with the girls in the class, he is very unprofessional.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews spanning online and . Credibility rating: Low.

⚠️ Professionalism Risk

20/100

“He flirts with the girls in the class, he is very unprofessional.”

🎯 Online Easy Win

78/100

“Very easy, but you still learn a lot. .”

📉 Split Teaching Quality

45/100

“Instructor very boring.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very easy, but you still learn a lot.
  • Instructor very boring.

Theme 2

⚠️ About Conduct

  • He flirts with the girls in the class, he is very unprofessional.

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Very easy, but you still learn a lot. .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews spanning 2013 to 2022 with totally opposite tones and thin assessment detail.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CHICANO0071 review
CHICANO0081 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values