AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Alicia Constantinople

MATH227 · STATISTICS · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

; students consistently report a hard, chaotic math experience with little support.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerUnorganizedLots of homeworkLecture heavyBroken promisesAvoid
  • All four reviews are strongly negative with .
  • Students , and unkept promises.
  • Reported grades and tone suggest high effort for poor outcomes.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Students report a super hard class, D+ grades, and no path to an easy A despite heavy effort.

Both online and and poor grade outcomes.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

14/100

Material and pacing feel extremely hard with heavy lectures and little effective teaching support.

Online stats and in-person MATH227 both rate difficulty 4-5.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

and skip-class tags warn you will not pass.

; online did not detail flexibility.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Every reviewer and warned others not to risk the class.

Zero positive recommendation across online and in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

14/100

, and no evidence of .

Format shift

; online review did not report a grade.

Workload

Overwhelming

16/100

Lots of , and projects stack up.

Format shift

Both formats mention heavy lectures and lots of homework.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

, and ineffective despite knowing the material.

Format shift

In-person reviews are more detailed on unprofessional communication; online focuses on marathon lectures.

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Heavy mix of homework, projects, lectures, and .

Format shift

and pop quizzes; online emphasizes lecture and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person MATH227 reviews describe unorganization, blamed students for , and privacy issues with grades.

Main concern

, and unprofessional grade display.

What students said

“she then started blaming me for the fact that I don't have the email and was making excuses instead of re-sending the email”
MATH227
“She made to many promises and never followed through”
MATH227
“is very unaware of what privacy means, (she shows the students' statlab grades on the overhead for everyone to see)”
MATH227

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The single online Statistics review describes overly long lectures with no breaks and a very hard course.

Main concern

Long lectures without breaks and high difficulty.

What students said

“She ran the lecture longer than was supposed to and gave no breaks at all.”
STATISTICS

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and unclear project rubrics more than student-friendly exams.

Pop quizzesHomework-heavyProject-based gradingLecture-dependent

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person students report pop quizzes, bizarre projects, and .

Pop quizzesProjectsUnclear rubrics
“BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES”
MATH227
“The ”
MATH227

Online

Online evidence ; the main complaint is unbroken long lectures.

Lecture heavy
“She ran the lecture longer than was supposed to and gave no breaks at all.”
STATISTICS

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Don't risk if you really want to learn.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 consistently negative reviews across online Statistics and in-person MATH227. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Recommendation

5/100

“Don't risk if you really want to learn.”

📉 Teaching Quality

12/100

“completely unorganized, not clear about certain things when asked”

📚 Workload

16/100

“Her lectures were always heavy and only had ”

⚠️ Communication Issues

10/100

“she then started blaming me for the fact that I don't have the email”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • relies strictly on notes to "teach"
  • She never used a

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • the class was super hard until the end
  • Lots of homework
  • only had

Theme 3

⚠️ About Professionalism

  • making excuses instead of re-sending the email
  • She made to many promises and never followed through
  • shows the students' statlab grades on the overhead for everyone to see

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Only four reviews from 2018-2021, but they are detailed and fully consistent in negative tone.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH2273 reviews
STATISTICS1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2