AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Patricia Doelitzsch

CDH · CHDEV001 · CHILDDEV1 · CHDEV44 · CD44 · CHDEV0137 · CHDEV3187 · CHDEV1 · CHD1 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

Take her for Child Development if you want a , and plan to attend class.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyMotherly teaching styleClear explanationsHelpful and niceEasy homeworkRoll taken
  • Most students call her a great, motherly Child Development teacher who is easy to listen to.
  • ; midterm and final are the main tests.
  • because of in-class work and roll, and one outlier found her a .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

and straightforward work, though one student got a C and called her a .

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

Students repeatedly call the class easy with and light content for Child Development.

; there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Students say you need to go to class for in-class assignments and she takes roll at the end of class.

; there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Nearly all detailed comments strongly recommend her as nice, helpful, and .

; there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

75/100

Most students report easy work and success, but one called her a and earned a C.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

80/100

and article summaries; some say no homework beyond midterm and final.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

, and lectures that are easy to listen to.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and some in-class assignments.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person Child Development classes feel supportive and motherly, with , and roll taken for attendance.

Main concern

One student called her harder than expected and a ; finishing work early can feel delayed by late review timing.

What students said

“she teaches in more of a motherly way than a teacher”
CDH
“GREAT TEACHER! If !”
CHDEV001
“Harder .”
CHDEV001

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and ; one review also tags tests as heavy.

Midterm and finalStudy guidance for examsLecture heavyTest heavy (outlier)

Assessment risk

Standard

65/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person, students mention midterm and and .

Midterm and finalIn-class assignmentsArticle reviews and observations
“She tells you what you need to study for .”
CHDEV001
“Alot of lecture but and/or and Final.”
CHILDDEV1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“GREAT TEACHER! If ! , but you do need to go to class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 in-person reviews, highlighting teaching warmth, light workload, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“She's a , and easy to listen to.”

👍 Recommendation

90/100

“ !!!”

📚 Workload

80/100

“ : 2-3 child observations and summarizing a few articles (both are easy).”

⚠️

30/100

“Harder .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she teaches in more of a motherly way than a teacher
  • , and easy to listen to
  • I loveeeeeeeeee her! You will learn and her teaching is interesting.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • easy class
  • Harder .
  • Alot of lecture but and/or and Final.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • really nice and helpful!
  • She's an OUTSTANDING Professor.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

, but most are old, grades are sparse, and one strong negative outlier reduces consistency.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CHDEV0012 reviews
CHDEV442 reviews
CD441 review
CDH1 review
CHD11 review
Show 4 more courses
CHDEV01371 review
CHDEV11 review
CHDEV31871 review
CHILDDEV11 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values