AI Rate Professor

Biology

Rasheeda Hawk

PHYSIOL1 · PHYSIOL001 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

outcomes may depend heavily on section organization, so verify structure early or .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing lecturesDisorganized planningFair exams (one view)Clear criteria (one view)Research-focused exit
  • Only two reviews exist and they sharply disagree on organization and teaching quality.
  • One Physiology student earned an A and .
  • The other withdrew and , and no study guidance.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

One student got an A by completing assignments with fair exams, but the .

All ; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Both rate difficulty around the middle, with no strong claims that Physiology content was unusually easy or brutal.

All ; there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

and the other says it was mandatory, so policy is unclear across sections.

All ; there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

and one would not, producing a pure split with almost no sample size.

All ; there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

One review reports most students earned A or B with fair exams; the other does not detail grade fairness after withdrawing.

Format shift

All .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Success is framed as doing all assignments and overwhelming load.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Praise for amazing lectures and , and disorganized PowerPoints.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Comments mention assignments and exams but do not establish a .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Two in-person Physiology reviews split between a fair, assignment-focused success story and a .

Main concern

Possible lack of syllabus clarity, study guides, and .

What students said

“Just do all of the assignments. The .”
PHYSIOL1
“ and she wouldn't tell us what might be on the .”
PHYSIOL001

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

one student calls exams fair while another says format and content were never explained.

Fair exams (one review)No study guide (one review)Unclear test format (one review)

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person evidence conflicts between fair exams and no guidance on what would be tested.

Fair examsNo study guideUnclear test format
“The .”
PHYSIOL1
“she wouldn't tell us what might be on the . No study guide.”
PHYSIOL001

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great professor. Most students got an A or B in the class. Just do all of the assignments. The .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 conflicting in-person reviews, stressing low sample size and split outcomes. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Split

50/100

“ and she wouldn't tell us what might be on the .”

👍 Recommendation Split

50/100

“Great professor. Most students got an A or B in the class.”

📋 Organization Risk

20/100

“She didn't have the syllabus in class on the first day”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing lectures
  • Seemed disinterested and said she was going back to research.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Most students got an A or B in the class.
  • The .
  • No study guide.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Only two conflicting in-person reviews from 2020-2021 provide too little consistent detail for high confidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHYSIOL0011 review
PHYSIOL11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1