AI Rate Professor

Education

Rita Grigorian

CD34 · CHILDDEV7 · CD4 · CHDV003 · CD2 · CHDEV3 · CD7 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid if possible; several students report learning little and poor classroom respect despite a few older positive notes.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing reviewsRude to studentsDated methodsHeavy observationsAvoid for CD
  • older praise versus many harsh modern complaints
  • 0% would-take-again among those who answered;
  • Complaints center on rudeness, outdated teaching, busywork, and wasted textbooks

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Some students earn A/A+ but tough-grader and heavy observation comments mean the A is not free.

Grade ease comments are mostly in-person; online only flags high difficulty.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is familiar CD material for some, but weekly observations and rigid methods raise challenge.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

while another says she does not care if you show up.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Would-take-again is 0% among recent answerers and multiple .

and in recent in-person reviews; older in-person notes are more positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

and claims of no credit for student ideas outweigh a few easy-A outcomes.

Format shift

; online only signals high difficulty.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Weekly observations, lots of homework, and many papers appear repeatedly.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Majority recent voice describes rudeness, boring lectures, and outdated methods despite some older praise.

Format shift

In-person reviews drive the split; the lone online review is simply negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Weekly observations, papers, and .

Format shift

Assignment and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

some praise experience with children, many call her rude, self-focused, and heavy on weekly observations.

Main concern

Rudeness, dated methods, heavy weekly work, and little open discussion of student ideas.

What students said

“Teaching methods are ridiculously dated & she does not agree with any ideas that dont fit within her model of teaching.”
CD7
“ ! She is very rude, gets annoyed when students ask questions, and is stuck on herself!”
CHILDDEV7
“Excellent professor. Respectful of students and lots of experience with children!”
CD7

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Single online review is strongly negative with high difficulty and .

Main concern

Only one sparse online review saying Not good.

What students said

“Not good”
034

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

One positive note says midterm and , but most reviews focus on papers and .

Take-home midterm and finalObservation assignmentsLimited exam detail

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and final; otherwise assessment centers on observations and papers.

Take-home midtermTake-home finalWeekly observations
“she is great!!! Mid-term and .”
CD4
“every week you have to turn in an observation she doesn't care about her students.”
CD34

Online

Online reviews .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! She is very rude, gets annoyed when students ask questions, and is stuck on herself!”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting polarization, rudeness complaints, and heavy observation work. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

18/100

“I would not recommend her at all, I suggest taking Silver or Rodriguez.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“You will learn nothing from this course you have not already learned from other CD classes.”

📚 Workload

28/100

“i would not recommend her at all she makes you do too much work every week you have to turn in an observation”

💔 Classroom Climate

25/100

“Horrible teacher, talks way to much, puts you on the and mean”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Teaching methods are ridiculously dated
  • She
  • Very boring, and didn't teach us a thing

Theme 2

😠 About Personality

  • Grigorian is rude and cares for only herself
  • She is OBSESSED with herself
  • Her answer is the only right answer.

Theme 3

👍 Older Positive Notes

  • Excellent professor. Respectful of students and lots of experience with children!
  • Great Teacher!!her classes are the .
  • Very Helpful and knowledgeable teacher.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

12 reviews show a ; detail is mixed and recent sentiment is strongly negative.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 57

Course coverage

CD75 reviews
0341 review
CD21 review
CD341 review
CD41 review
Show 3 more courses
CHDEV31 review
CHDV0031 review
CHILDDEV71 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1