AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Kevin Windsor

MATH3270 · MATH3329 · MATHMATH · MATHEMATICS · MATH112 · MATH115 · MATH3312 · M125 · MATH125 · PREAL112 · 29 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

if you want a strict, high-workload math grind; most reviews advise avoiding him.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderLots of homeworkTest heavyRude demeanorHigh expectations
  • Many students call him rude, unhelpful, and extremely strict with and .
  • A smaller group of and high standards.
  • and the class often feels high-pressure and unforgiving.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

24/100

Tough grading, test-heavy design, and frequent fail or .

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

High difficulty ratings and comments about fast lectures and impossible tests dominate.

All evidence is in-person.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

14/100

Multiple reports of , and assigned seating.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

, but most detailed comments strongly warn others away.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

and stories of impossible tests and .

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Overwhelming

16/100

Lots of online and , and frequent tests overwhelm many students.

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

and effective, but many describe boring, rushed lectures and hostility to questions.

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

students underprepared for exams.

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

but leans negative: , and frequent complaints about rudeness.

Main concern

Harsh tone, fast pace, and .

What students said

“This professor doesnt want his students to pass. He does everything to fail a student.”
MATH125
“If you are serious about college and your career you will love this professor.”
MATH115
“ !!!!!!!”
MATH125

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as hard, note-restricted, and high-stakes with strict classroom control.

No notes on testsHard testsTest heavyStrict seating

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and paired with strict seating and high fail pressure.

No notes on testsHard testsTest heavyAssigned seating
“dosent let u use notes in test!!”
PREAL112
“He does not allow notes so he expects u to know everything from ea. ch.”
MATH125

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !!! If you want .”

Voice snapshots generated from 29 reviews, highlighting workload, grading strictness, and polarized teaching. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

36/100

“His teaching method is the worst.”

📚 Workload Overload

16/100

“Expect a lot of homework, as long as you manage your time you can complete it.”

😠 Classroom Climate

20/100

“He is rude and impatient.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • His lectures are boring and goes over material quickly.
  • he doesn't teach, too much work out of the book & online.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • TEST HEAVY
  • He does not allow notes so he expects u to know everything from ea. ch.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • He was so rude.
  • Humiliates anyone for simple questions or remarks
  • If you are serious about college and your career you will love this professor.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

29

Recent reviews read by the AI

29

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-nine in-person reviews over many years with consistent harsh-workload and demeanor themes give high confidence.

Inside 29 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 51
3 out of 55
2 out of 59
1 out of 57

Course coverage

MATH12513 reviews
MATH1126 reviews
MATH1152 reviews
1151 review
M1251 review
Show 6 more courses
MATH32701 review
MATH33121 review
MATH33291 review
MATHEMATICS1 review
MATHMATH1 review
PREAL1121 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Audit/No_Grade 1 · Rather not say 1