AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Louis Tartaglia

ANTHR101 · ANTHRO111 · ANTHRO · ANTHR1000 · ANTHRO102 · ANTRO101 · ANTHRO101 · ANTHRO121 · ANTHR104 · ANTHR102 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

Only consider if and study guides; many recent students strongly advise against him.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTest heavyArrogant toneStudy guide dependentTrick questionsLecture tangents
  • older reviews call him easy with free review answers; newer ones call him arrogant and unfair.
  • Grade ; little homework.
  • Would-take-again rate is 0% among those who answered; .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Some older students got easy grades from study guides, but many , and As.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Content is often described as easy if you read the book, though trick questions and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

if you read the book; and you will not pass.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Zero would-take-again among respondents and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

, and intentional trick questions appear repeatedly.

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Light

72/100

; and one paper, so reading load replaces busywork.

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Knows the field but often off-topic, arrogant with questions, and boring powerpoints; passion notes are outnumbered.

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

85/100

Roughly 90-95% of ; almost no homework.

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person anthro with , and frequent off-topic lectures; experience ranges from easy A with book reading to arrogant, trick-question exams.

Main concern

Personality and fairness complaints plus purposely tricky tests make the experience risky despite sometimes easy content.

What students said

“Do. Not. Take.”
ANTHRO102
“He even boasts in class about how he adds trick questions.”
ANTHRO101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; study guides help but fairness complaints are common.

Multiple choice trick questionsStudy guidesCumulative finalBone ID labs in some sectionsTest heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Multiple-choice tests with trick options and study guides; some lab bone tests and a .

Trick multiple choiceStudy guidesTEST HEAVYFinal essay
“ and is designed to trick you on purpose even if you study the study guide.”
ANTHRO101
“ and a ”
ANTHRO111

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do. Not. Take.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 in-person reviews, highlighting polarized teaching and . Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Recommendation Risk

28/100

“Do. Not. Take.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“hes very arrogant. We were asking questions to reassure our answers. But he just tell us that he already explained it yesterday.”

📝

32/100

“He even boasts in class about how he adds trick questions.”

📚

72/100

“Read the book and you'll ace the tests/quizes.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Boring professor, his tests are word for word from the book.
  • lectures are off the subject most of time
  • I'd nickname him Dr. Tangentia.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and is designed to trick you on purpose
  • The and dropped my A+ to a B.
  • if you want an A/B+

Theme 3

⚠️ Student Warnings

  • Do. Not. Take.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen in-person reviews from 2007-2018 with rich detail; tone shifts over time but .

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ANTHR1014 reviews
ANTHRO1012 reviews
ANTHR10001 review
ANTHR1021 review
ANTHR1041 review
Show 5 more courses
ANTHRO1 review
ANTHRO1021 review
ANTHRO1111 review
ANTHRO1211 review
ANTRO1011 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values