AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Ching Ching Chen

MATH240 · MATH125 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

; teaching is widely described as unusable and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProCannot TeachConfusing LecturesMandatory AttendanceExtra Credit LifelineAvoid At All Costs
  • Near-universal reports of , frequent mistakes, and
  • Attendance is mandatory and
  • can salvage grades for a few, but most still rate teaching as unusable

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

A few students reached A via heavy and study guides, but because lectures never made sense.

; no online reviews exist.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Material becomes hard mainly because , and rather than from advanced content alone.

; no online reviews exist.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Multiple , and she may drop students who miss class.

; no online reviews exist.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

and repeated run-away language across a decade of reviews.

; no online reviews exist.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

58/100

worksheets and study-guide credit can raise poor test scores to A for students who attend every class.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Workload centers on tests, study guides, and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Students consistently say she cannot teach, makes mistakes, blocks the board, and gets irritated by questions.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Grades lean on tests plus extra-credit worksheets that count toward exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person MATH125 and MATH240 students describe rushed board work, unclear explanations, irritability when asked questions, and .

Main concern

and becomes upset when students ask questions.

What students said

“ !”
MATH240
“She doesn't teach! She does problems on the board but .”
MATH125
“ !”
MATH125

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

in class, but weak teaching still makes preparation difficult.

Study Guide Aligned TestsExtra Credit Toward Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as easy when matched to study guides she completed with the class for credit.

Study Guide Aligned TestsExtra Credit Toward Tests
“ because it was just like her study guide.”
MATH125
“I always got C's on the test but the raised all my tests to A's”
MATH125

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Prof Chen is the . ... !”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 in-person reviews spanning 2010-2016, highlighting teaching failure, attendance pressure, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Teaching Quality

12/100

“She isn't a teacher. She does problems so quickly on the board and .”

👎 Recommendation

8/100

“ unless you want to be in utter confusion.”

📅

12/100

“She gets upset if you ask ANY questions and if you miss class.”

🎁 Path

58/100

“I always got C's on the test but the raised all my tests to A's”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She does problems on the board but
  • always makes mistakes when teaching
  • thick accent that prevents you from learning anything

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • because it was just like her study guide
  • raised all my tests to A's
  • If you are not a mathematician, don't even bother

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Climate

  • Gets irritated when you ask questions
  • can be very vindictive
  • picks on you if you don't show up

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Ten detailed, consistent negative reviews from 2010-2016 give solid signal, but the sample is older and somewhat concentrated in MATH125.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 57

Course coverage

MATH1258 reviews
1251 review
MATH2401 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 1