AI Rate Professor

Counseling

Robert Schwartz

COUNSELING17 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Good pick for students needing study skills support in a slower, structured counseling course.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyDisability-focused paceStudy skills coachWorkbook heavySupportive counselorSlow and steady
  • Single review praises a slow, supportive counseling class for students with disabilities.
  • Workbook and study-skills exercises drive the experience.
  • and the course feels beginner-friendly.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

Low difficulty rating and practical workbook focus suggest an A is attainable with regular participation.

All evidence comes from the single in-person review.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

85/100

Content is intentionally paced slowly for accessibility and study-skill building.

All evidence comes from the single in-person review.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

The .

All evidence comes from the single in-person review.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

The and found the class clarifying and skill-building.

All evidence comes from the single in-person review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

; class focuses on skills and workbook completion.

Format shift

All evidence comes from the single in-person review.

Workload

Light

74/100

Main work is workbook exercises and light study-skill practice.

Format shift

All evidence comes from the single in-person review.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Described as helpful for goals, study skills, and engaging exercises.

Format shift

All evidence comes from the single in-person review.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Workbook use is central; .

Format shift

All evidence comes from the single in-person review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

at a slower pace with workbook work.

Main concern

Only one review, so experience may not generalize.

What students said

“Class is meant for students with disabilities so it goes a bit slow. It helped me decide what I wanted from school.”
COUNSELING17

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; course emphasis is workbook and exercises.

Workbook-centered

Assessment risk

Varies

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; student highlights workbook use and study-skill exercises.

Workbook-centered
“Do the workbook! He uses the workbook a lot!”
COUNSELING17

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Class is meant for students with disabilities so it goes a bit slow. It helped me decide what I wanted from school.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review, highlighting pacing, workbook use, and study skills. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“I learned study skills I did not know before. There are some fun excercizes.”

📘 Workbook Focus

74/100

“Do the workbook! He uses the workbook a lot!”

👍

82/100

“Yes”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • goes a bit slow
  • There are some fun excercizes
  • I learned study skills I did not know before

Theme 2

📈 About Course Fit

  • meant for students with disabilities
  • helped me decide what I wanted from school
  • Do the workbook!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only one review from 2016 limits confidence despite clear positive detail.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

COUNSELING171 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values