AI Rate Professor

Writing

Richard Ramos

BASICSKILLS · BASK23 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want a supportive basic-skills instructor, but evidence is thin.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyHelpful writing mentorEngaging anecdotesSolid writing growthPatient instructor
  • Students credit him with making them better writers
  • Lectures use anecdotes that students enjoy
  • Only two sparse old reviews limit certainty

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Difficulty sits mid-range and no grades are reported, so an A looks like solid fair effort rather than free.

All .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Both reviewers rate difficulty at 3 with no signs of either trivial content or extreme challenge.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Neither review states whether attendance was required or optional.

All .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Both students left high quality scores and positive comments about writing growth.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

No grade outcomes or toughness tags appear, so as average fairness.

Format shift

All .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Comments never describe homework volume, so workload is treated as moderate by default.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Students highlight helpful writing coaching and enjoyable anecdotal lectures.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not specify whether .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students praise his anecdotes and say he improved their writing.

Main concern

Very few and very old reviews with .

What students said

“Loved the use of andedotes.”
BASICSKILLS
“Let me say that he helped me become a better writer.”
BASK23

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

.

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews do not .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Let me say that he helped me become a better writer.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews, highlighting writing help and lecture style. Credibility rating: Low.

✍️ Writing Growth

78/100

“Let me say that he helped me become a better writer.”

🎤 Engaging Lectures

80/100

“Loved the use of andedotes.”

👍 Overall Quality

72/100

“Let me say that he helped me become a better writer.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Loved the use of andedotes.
  • Let me say that he helped me become a better writer.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Course DIFFICULTY rating: 3
  • Not provided

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two short reviews from 2011 and 2015 with missing grades, tags, and .

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

BASICSKILLS1 review
BASK231 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values