AI Rate Professor

English

Stan Searl

ENG102ITV · ENGL102 · ENGLISH102ITV · ENG102 · ENG7093 · ENG101 · ENGLISH102 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
71/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want an engaging English professor and will put .

Best fit · Effort For RewardPassionate lecturerWeekly essaysAnimated deliveryTough grader for someBook required
  • Most students praise his passion and animated literature lectures.
  • Weekly essays and ; make-ups are often allowed.
  • A minority report unclear expectations and harsh grade disputes.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

56/100

Weekly essays and , but an A usually requires consistent writing effort and .

Online comments lean easier; .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

Content is standard English composition with weekly essays and , though 8-week ITV paces feel fast.

Both formats describe similar essay-heavy English 102 content.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

Reviews rarely spell out a policy, so and likely class-dependent.

Neither online nor .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Most students recommend him for passion and learning, with a and clarity.

Online reviews are strongly positive; in-person is more mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Make-ups and do-able essays help, but and refused grade bumps.

Format shift

Harsh grade disputes appear mainly in in-person comments.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Expect weekly in-class or , and a research paper in compressed terms.

Format shift

Online and .

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

Students repeatedly call him passionate and animated, with occasional complaints of vague expectations or poor communication.

Format shift

Online praise is nearly uniform; in-person quality is more polarized.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and a research paper rather than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

Same assignment-heavy pattern online and in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person and ITV reviews mostly love his energy, but a few call him vague, emotional, or a .

Main concern

Some students say and grade disputes feel personal.

What students said

“Easy class with if you miss one. Very passionate about literature and his lectures are very animated.”
ENGL102
“Always told me I was on the right track when I went over my analysis w/ him, then gave me .”
ENG101
“ what he wants, he outright refused to provide this). Makes an easy class difficult. A very tough grader.”
ENG102ITV

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online ENG102 , and relatively easy with .

Main concern

Book is required for weekly essays; .

What students said

“Awesome teacher. Great Attitude. Loves what he does. Clearly very passionate about English.”
ENG102
“8 weeks flew by! Professor Searl is very passionate & loves engaging us students by .”
ENGLISH102

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly essay-driven with ; proctoring details are not clearly described.

Weekly essaysIn-class essaysResearch paperOnline discussions

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person/ITV students describe weekly in-class essays, discussions, and a research paper; exams are mentioned only lightly.

In-class essaysResearch paperOnline discussions
“Be prepared to write an with a research paper due week 7.”
ENG102
“ paper.”
ENGL102

Online

Online reviews emphasize weekly do-able essays and required book use more than formal proctored exams.

Weekly essaysBook required
“The book is a must for the .”
ENGLISH102

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He's the !”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews (2 online, 11 in , and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🔥 Passion and Energy

74/100

“Very passionate about literature and his lectures are very animated to say the least.”

📝 Essay-Centered Work

55/100

“There are as well.”

⚠️

52/100

“I ended up with a 89.8% and he refused to give me the A.”

👍

72/100

“ if you are serious about English.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Loves what he does. Clearly very passionate about English.
  • he's not afraid to get in your face to emphasize a line in a story.
  • , but no concrete examples of .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Easy class with if you miss one.
  • Overall getting a B is manageable, I worked for the A
  • A . .

Theme 3

📚 About Course Structure

  • The book is a must for the .
  • .
  • Read all the stories and do not wait until the end .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen reviews span many years with consistent passion themes, but dates are old, grades are sparse, and quality scores split between strong fans and critics.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG1026 reviews
ENGL1022 reviews
ENG1011 review
ENG102ITV1 review
ENG70931 review
Show 2 more courses
ENGLISH1021 review
ENGLISH102ITV1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1