AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Rita Basta

GEO127 · MATH245 · MATH103 · GEO121 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

Avoid if ; only take her if .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized lecturesHard to followRude and humiliatingSelf-teach requiredPublic call-outs
  • Most students say and .
  • Many report rudeness, public humiliation, and .
  • A few note worksheets and a if you keep up with homework.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Material can be basic, but and heavy demands mean an A and grind.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Students call the content simple yet say her pace, confusion, and disorganization make the class .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

, so flexibility cannot be confirmed.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most and call her a poor teacher.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

One student mentions a and , but overall tone is harsh and unforgiving.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students report , and pressure that can crowd out other classes.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Dominant theme is disorganized, hard-to-follow lectures with only a few positive outliers.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Homework, tests, worksheets, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly negative about unclear lectures, sloppy board work, and a harsh classroom tone, with a and worksheets can help you pass.

Main concern

and demeaning treatment leave students unprepared.

What students said

“The class itself is simple but the professor herself is very difficult to understand.”
MATH245
“She's a horrible teacher. She makes easy material difficult to understand.”
MATH245
“ ! but here!”
MATH245

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and helpful worksheets but .

In-person testsStudy worksheetsTest corrections

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person tests with study worksheets and ; no clear proctoring policy stated.

In-person testsStudy worksheetsTest corrections
“She gives out study worksheets for the and as long as you don't slack off, you'll do well.”
MATH245
“She makes sure you learn the material by and correct your test mistakes after the .”
MATH245

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !!”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 in-person reviews spanning 2005-2013, highlighting confusion, harsh tone, and rare positives. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Quality

28/100

“Very ! Math was always my strong suit but after taking her I realized because of teachers like her.”

🚫 Recommendation

18/100

“ ! but here!”

😤 Classroom Tone

25/100

“this teacher is mean, discouraging and rude.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She confuses herself while teaching or explaining a problem on the board
  • She rushes through sections, like 3-5 per class

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The material isnt too hard, but she makes it quite difficult
  • as long as you don't slack off, you'll do well
  • She also grades on a

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • she's rude and insulting
  • will publicly humiliate you
  • Don't get on her bad side

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen detailed in-person reviews span 2005-2013 with consistent negative themes, but all are older and lack recent data.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 56
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH24511 reviews
GEO1211 review
GEO1271 review
MATH1031 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values