AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Julie Ruelas

CD4 · CD1 · CHDEV001 · CD014 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.5

The decision

if you stay on top of assignments, but expect communication and clarity issues.

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy ALenient DeadlinesHard to UnderstandLots of BusyworkSweet Personality
  • Many students call the class very easy and an easy A if work is submitted on time.
  • She is often described as sweet and lenient with late work, but hard to understand.
  • Some students report and delayed grades, especially in online-style sections.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Multiple students explicitly call it an easy A if you complete and keep up with assignments.

All .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

85/100

Difficulty ratings are very low and students repeatedly describe the class as very easy.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

Most like the easy path and sweetness, but clarity and communication complaints pull the recommendation down.

Mixed recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Students report lenient late assignments and easy A outcomes when work is submitted.

Format shift

Leniency comments are from in-person-coded reviews only.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

There is a lot of assignment and discussion writing, but it is described as easy busywork rather than hard content.

Format shift

Workload comments come from in-person-coded reviews only.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Students find her sweet and , yet often hard to understand and sometimes slow to respond.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Grades appear driven by ongoing assignments and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Students mostly report an easy, assignment-driven class with a sweet instructor, offset by accent clarity issues and .

Main concern

Hard-to-understand delivery and slow communication can frustrate .

What students said

“A lot of work but very easy. As long as you keep up with the .”
CD014
“She is super easy and helpful. Do the work and you will be fine.”
CHDEV001
“ and she didn't give me my grade until later.”
CD1
“Very easy class and . .”
CD4

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize easy assignments and closed deadlines more than strict proctored exams.

Assignment HeavyDeadline Driven

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

rather than describing proctored exams.

Assignment HeavyDeadline DrivenLenient Late Work
“As long as you keep up with the .”
CD014
“ .”
CHDEV001

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“A lot of work but very easy. As long as you keep up with the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting easy grading versus communication and clarity issues. Credibility rating: Medium.

🅰️ Easy A Path

82/100

“As long as you keep up with the .”

❤️ Sweet and Understanding

75/100

“She is so sweet. Eventhough i had a .”

📧 Communication Friction

35/100

“ and she didn't give me my grade until later.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • it is an easy A
  • super easy and helpful
  • Very easy class

Theme 2

🗣️ About Clarity & Communication

  • difficult to understand
  • with the help from her assistant you can get through it

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Four reviews from 2009-2010 agree on easiness but diverge on communication quality and lack grade tables.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CD0141 review
CD11 review
CD41 review
CHDEV0011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values