AI Rate Professor

Law

Adam Telanoff

LAW12 · LAW16 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

Avoid this professor; communication and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProIgnores emailsUnfair gradingNo feedbackHardest classAvoid
  • Multiple students say he ignores emails and does not check online class activity.
  • as arbitrary, late, or based on unstated rules.
  • Most call him among the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

Students call it the hardest class and .

.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

Repeatedly labeled the hardest class with and no support.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

reviews.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

and only one empty five-star comment with no substance.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Students say , and deducts for unannounced rules.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

and high difficulty ratings.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Students report no concern for learners, no email replies, and no real teaching.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Comments focus on many assignments and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person and hybrid-style law courses show extreme dissatisfaction with unresponsiveness and .

Main concern

, and .

What students said

“This teacher should not be teaching he does not answer e-mails and .”
LAW12
“Will not answer emails, still no grades on the past 10 assignments”
LAW16
“he grades at his will,not by accuracy or fairness. Score,Zero”
LAW12

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do not take this professor, not only does he ignore you, but he asks for an assignment to be done and then turns around and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews focused on unresponsiveness and . Credibility rating: Medium.

📧 Communication Failure

10/100

“Will not answer emails, still no grades on the past 10 assignments”

⚖️

15/100

“he grades at his will,not by accuracy or fairness. Score,Zero”

🚫 Recommendation

12/100

“I have never had such a bad teacher. ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This teacher should not be teaching he does not answer e-mails
  • One who should not be "teaching". He shows no concern for the students
  • He has not (to date,) checked in this Springs internet class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • this is the hardest class in the paralegal program

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

Four older reviews (2006-2010) are highly consistent on unresponsiveness, but one empty high rating and small sample limit certainty.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

LAW123 reviews
LAW161 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values