AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Chermaine Wijesekera

MATHMATH · MATH115 · MATH125 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if .

Best fit · Self Taught ProChronically lateDoes not explainRedirects to math labHard to understandAvoid
  • Nearly every student calls her the and urges others to switch.
  • She is often late, moves too fast, and will not help with homework.
  • Accent and disorganization make lectures for many.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

25/100

High difficulty ratings and no instructional support make earning a strong grade a heavy lift.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

Students cannot keep up with fast pacing and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

She is repeatedly late yet still expects students to wait past policy limits.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Every detailed review strongly advises switching to another teacher.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Little direct grade talk, but frustration and high difficulty imply unforgiving outcomes.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

40/100

as hard to get help on rather than as huge volume.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Students describe no teaching ability, chronic lateness, and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews focus on teaching failure more than the balance of .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person math students report chronic lateness, weak explanations, and .

Main concern

No help in class and lectures that move too fast to follow.

What students said

“The ! Her teaching abilities (or lack thereof) are terrible”
MATH125
“Very disorganized, LATE TO EVERY CLASS BY 15-30 minutes”
MATH115
“ .W. problems... ”
MATH125

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if at all possible. She really is as bad as everyone says.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 consistently negative in-person reviews. Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Teaching Quality

10/100

“The ! Her teaching abilities (or lack thereof) are terrible, horrible...ridiculous.”

⏰ Class Reliability

15/100

“LATE TO EVERY CLASS BY 15-30 minutes, but excepts you to still wait for her”

❓ Help Availability

12/100

“If anyone had problems with math lab without even trying to help you!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She has a heavy accent and doesn't answer when you ask her questions.
  • Very hard to understand and moves very quickly.
  • .W. problems.

Theme 2

❤️ About Reliability & Care

  • Teacher was always late.
  • LATE TO EVERY CLASS BY 15-30 minutes
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Five consistent negative reviews from 2008-2010 across MATH115 and MATH125 give a .

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH1152 reviews
MATH1252 reviews
MATHMATH1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values