AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Robert Sliff

PHIL1 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you want a meaningful intro philosophy course that still grades generously.

Best fit · Easy A HunterThought-provokingExtra credit generousPractical philosophyOnline study aidsEasy A path
  • Students praise clear, grounded philosophy teaching that still makes you think.
  • and timed open-lookup quizzes make high grades very achievable.
  • Online study aids support learning with low reported difficulty.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

plus quizzes that give time to look up answers produced a 109 percent A.

All .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Difficulty is low and content is approachable, though still reflective rather than trivial.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

review.

All .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Student calls both the class and professor great and highlights meaningful, practical teaching.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

Plenty of and a reported 109 percent A show very lenient outcomes.

Format shift

Based on one in-person review.

Workload

Light

78/100

Online quizzes and study aids keep work manageable with low difficulty.

Format shift

Based on one in-person review.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Praised as a great professor who is both thought-provoking and practically grounded.

Format shift

Based on one in-person review.

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

and study aids rather than heavy exams.

Format shift

Based on one in-person review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

blends big life questions with practical grounding and easy high grades.

Main concern

Only one old review, so depth and consistency are unproven.

What students said

“A great class and a great professor. Makes you think about your life's purpose; yet, keeps you well grounded in practical reality.”
PHIL1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Online quizzes ask detailed questions but allow time to look up answers, which is student-friendly.

Online quizzesLookup time allowedExtra credit

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

85/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

.

Online quizzesLookup time allowedExtra credit
“ , but he gives you plenty of time to look up the answers.”
PHIL1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“A great class and a great professor. Makes you think about your life's purpose; yet, keeps you well grounded in practical reality.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting teaching depth and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“A great class and a great professor. Makes you think about your life's purpose; yet, keeps you well grounded in practical reality.”

📈 Easy High Grade

88/100

“Got an "A" with a 109% score.”

🎁 Path

90/100

“Gives plenty of opportunities to earn extra credits.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • A great class and a great professor.
  • Makes you think about your life's purpose; yet, keeps you well grounded in practical reality.
  • He provides good on-line study aids.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Gives plenty of opportunities to earn extra credits.
  • , but he gives you plenty of time to look up the answers.
  • Got an "A" with a 109% score.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only one review from 2009 with no grade distribution or .

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values