AI Rate Professor

Criminal Justice

Jennifer Garcia

ADMJUS104 · 0 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
0.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
0.0

The decision

unless you are fully self-sufficient and prepared for and poor communication.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnresponsiveSlow GradingDismissiveSyllabus ContradictionsHard To Take Seriously
  • Extremely unresponsive and slow to grade, ignoring messages for months
  • weeks
  • Communication was dismissive and contradicted the syllabus

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting a fair grade is hard because work sat ungraded for months and the instructor was hard to reach.

Evidence comes only from the single Online review.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Student rated difficulty high and found it hard to take the class seriously amid poor management.

Evidence comes only from the single Online review.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

85/100

.

Evidence comes only from the single Online review.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Students are unlikely to recommend an unresponsive instructor who leaves work ungraded and dismisses concerns.

Evidence comes only from the single Online review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

and stalled for two months, leaving students unsure of standing.

Format shift

Based solely on the Online review.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

, so workload intensity is unclear.

Format shift

Based solely on the Online review.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Instructor was unresponsive, dismissive, and failed to grade for months while contradicting the syllabus.

Format shift

Based solely on the Online review.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Mentions early assignments that were graded then left ungraded; .

Format shift

Based solely on the Online review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online experience was poorly managed with months of ungraded work, ignored emails, and .

Main concern

Instructor may vanish for long stretches and leave major work ungraded until the end of term.

What students said

“She graded the and then did not grade anything else for two months.”
ADMJUS104
“I emailed multiple times in Canvas and , but she did not get back to me until two weeks before the class ended.”
ADMJUS104

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Reviews do not clearly prove online exam format, webcam use, or proctoring rules.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . She graded the first few assignments and then did not grade anything else for two months.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 Online review, highlighting unresponsiveness and . Credibility rating: Low.

📉 Teaching Quality

15/100

“She was unresponsive and dismissive when she finally got back to me.”

⏱️

20/100

“She graded the and then did not grade anything else for two months.”

👎 Recommendation Risk

12/100

“ .”

Theme 1

📵 About Communication

  • I emailed multiple times in Canvas and , but she did not get back to me until two weeks before the class ended.
  • She was unresponsive and dismissive when she finally got back to me.

Theme 2

📝

  • She graded the and then did not grade anything else for two months.
  • (contradicted syllabus)

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

0

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only one recent Online review with strong negative detail but no corroborating sample or grade outcome.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ADMJUS1041 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1