Susan Morvaridi

CHEMISTRY · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 16/100
RMP rating: 1.0/5
Take again: 0%
Difficulty: 5.0

The decision

Avoid if ; only self-driven students might survive the communication gap.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard to UnderstandPoor CommunicationMandatory AttendanceQuiz-HeavyNot Learning-Focused

In-person chemistry has severe communication and language barriers.
but class is often cut short for outside videos.
Exams are manageable yet students report little real learning and one withdrawal.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

One B and one Drop/Withdrawal with high difficulty ratings and .

Evidence is from In person reviews only.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Difficulty rated 5/5 and content is due to language and structure issues.

Evidence is from In person reviews only.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Both reviews state attendance was mandatory for long scheduled lecture blocks.

Evidence is from In person reviews only.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

Both students rate quality 1/5 and advise looking elsewhere to learn.

Evidence is from In person reviews only.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Exams were described as okay, but .

Format shift

Evidence is from In person reviews only.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Quizzes can be done anytime, yet mandatory long class blocks and exams add load.

Format shift

Evidence is from In person reviews only.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Students cite poor English, weak communication, and little useful live instruction.

Format shift

Evidence is from In person reviews only.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of no-due-date quizzes and in-class exams drives the grade.

Format shift

Evidence is from In person reviews only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person chemistry is mandatory attendance with weak live teaching, , and but not great for learning.

Main concern

Language and communication issues make lectures and .

What students said

“Could scarcely understand this instructor as I believe English to be her 2nd language.”
chemistry

“if you're .”
chemistry

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are in-class, not proctored online, with quizzes that can be batch-completed.

In-class examsUnproctored examsQuizzes without due dates

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Exams are taken in class without proctoring software; bring scratch paper; quizzes often lack due dates.

In-class examsNot proctoredQuizzes no due date

“Exams are not proctored so .”
chemistry

“ so you can do them all at once.”
chemistry

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“if you're .”
Voice snapshots generated from 2 In person reviews, highlighting communication barriers and weak learning value. Credibility rating: Low.

📉 Teaching Quality

12/100

“Could scarcely understand this instructor as I believe English to be her 2nd language.”

🗣️ Communication Gap

15/100

“Communication is a real issue that must be addressed.”

📚 Learning Value

10/100

“if you're .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

Lectures were scheduled for 3 hours and we were dismissed at 2 being told to watch lectures.
Could scarcely understand this instructor as I believe English to be her 2nd language.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

, as they weren't too hard.
Quizzes and announcements were so badly written that my answers were wrong through no fault of my own.

Theme 3

🧾

Exams are not proctored so .
so you can do them all at once.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Two consistent negative In person reviews with solid detail, but sample size remains small.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50

4 out of 50

3 out of 50

2 out of 50

1 out of 52

Course coverage

chemistry2 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

No reported values

B range

B 1

C range

No reported values

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

Drop/Withdrawal 1

Susan Morvaridi

Avoid if x x x x; only self-driven students might survive the communication gap.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

HardWork

Challenging

Mandatory

Avoid

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

📉 Teaching Quality

🗣️ Communication Gap

📚 Learning Value

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

🧾 x x x x

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported

Avoid if ; only self-driven students might survive the communication gap.

🧾