AI Rate Professor

Theater

Greg Brown

Courses not reported · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

unprepared, disengaged instruction with shortened class time.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisengagedCuts class shortInconsistentGroup projectsSo many papers
  • Single review reports almost no meaningful instruction and forgotten materials.
  • Class is cut short by about 20 minutes every session.
  • Course feels below college standards with papers and group projects but weak teaching.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

No grade reported and comments do not show an easy path to an A; teaching quality is the main barrier.

Evidence comes from a .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Difficulty rating is mid-range, but weak instruction makes the experience harder than content alone.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

described.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Quality rating of 1 and a report that the course fails college-level expectations.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

40/100

; papers and group projects are noted without grade outcomes.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Tagged with group projects and so .

Format shift

Workload notes come only from the one in-person review.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Reviewer cites forgotten materials, no meaningful instruction, and disengagement.

Format shift

All teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Tags and and group projects rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One in-person theater review describes inconsistent teaching, forgotten materials, and shortened classes.

Main concern

Little meaningful instruction and sessions cut short every meeting.

What students said

“The instructor lacks consistency and engagement.multiple times he forgets materials and conducted little to no meaningful instruction.”
9523
“class periods are cut short every session by 20 minutes this reduces the ”
9523

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

review.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The course has not lived up to the standards expected at a college level.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review with uniformly negative teaching claims. Credibility rating: Low.

💥 Teaching Disaster

12/100

“conducted little to no meaningful instruction.”

⏱️ Class Time Cut

15/100

“class periods are cut short every session by 20 minutes”

👎

8/100

“The instructor lacks consistency and engagement.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • multiple times he forgets materials
  • lacks consistency and engagement
  • little to no meaningful instruction

Theme 2

📝 About Workload

  • Group projects
  • So many papers

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only one review with no grade and .

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

95231 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values