AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Julia Dahlstrom

M17 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
12.5%
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

Avoid unless you must take M17 and are ready for strict formats, heavy work, and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderLots of HomeworkGroup ProjectsUnapproachableNitpicky Feedback
  • and weak communication.
  • , and group work drive high workload.
  • if you strictly follow APA and feedback.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

can rescue grades, but tough grading and and uncertain.

Online reviews paint getting a high grade as much harder than the single in-person success story.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Lots of reading, papers, discussions, and and process burden.

Difficulty pressure is strongest in online reviews; .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

72/100

Most reviews report attendance not mandatory, with only one online note of .

Online evidence is mixed but ; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

and multiple students explicitly warn others not to enroll.

Online majority is strongly negative; the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

and complaints of rubric inconsistency and .

Format shift

Online is especially harsh; if followed carefully.

Workload

Heavy

26/100

Lots of , and group projects appear across reviews.

Format shift

Workload complaints are mainly online; and formats.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Common themes are unapproachability, weak communication, and .

Format shift

Online quality is mostly 1-2; the single in-person review rates quality 5.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Papers, discussions, homework, and .

Format shift

Both formats emphasize assignments and projects over formal exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Single in-person review says the class starts strict but becomes doable if and use perfect APA.

Main concern

Strict and citation rules.

What students said

“Tbh, in the beginning it was really difficult because she has strict formats for how she wants things done.”
M17
“if and apply it to your next assignment, you'll do great.”
M17

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online M17 is widely described as tough-graded, assignment-heavy, and hard to contact, with .

Main concern

, email unresponsiveness, and nitpicky grading that can tank grades despite effort.

What students said

“Whatever . and when she answers she claims she did but she did not.”
M17
“Steer so . I've had bad professors before, but she was by far the worst.”
M17
“She nitpicks every little thing on the assignments and is overall difficult to contact if you have any questions.”
M17

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on papers and projects rather than clearly described exams, so .

Assignment HeavyGroup ProjectsExtra Credit

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and APA rather than a stated exam policy.

Strict FormatsAPA RequiredFeedback-Based Improvement
“Also, CITE EVERYTHING, do EVERYTHING in APA format.”
M17

Online

Online comments emphasize papers, discussions, group projects, and rather than proctored exams.

Lots of HomeworkGroup ProjectsExtra CreditDiscussion Heavy
“Not the worst, but a lot of reading and assignments. .”
M17
“the only reason I got a B was because of the she offered. There was also a .”
M17

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Whatever . and when she answers she claims she did but she did not.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting harsh grading, workload, and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

⚠️ Teaching Experience

28/100

“I've had bad professors before, but she was by far the worst. , and is very unapproachable.”

📉 Recommendation Rate

18/100

“ .”

⚖️

18/100

“Does not grade based off the rubric and wont tell you what you did wrong”

📝 Workload Pressure

26/100

“Not the worst, but a lot of reading and assignments. .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching & Communication

  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She nitpicks every little thing on the assignments
  • I had a 68 most of the semester, and the only reason I got a B was because of the

Theme 3

📚 About Workload & Format

  • Lots of homework
  • So many papers
  • Group projects

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Eight recent reviews with consistent tough-grader themes and .

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 55

Course coverage

M178 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Rather not say 1