AI Rate Professor

Ethnic Studies

Dianna carrillo

Courses not reported · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if ethnic studies interests you and ; treat the online version as high-risk.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHeavy ReadingPolarizing OnlineTough GraderCaring When You AskExtra Credit
  • In-person students often love the lectures and call the class a breeze with strong As.
  • Online students frequently report harsh picky grading, dense lectures, and .
  • Success depends on asking for help early and keeping up with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

40/100

Many students still earn As, but and picky so an A and careful writing.

In-person students report easier As; online .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

Content is reading- and lecture-heavy with dense material, especially online, even when interested students find it stimulating.

In-person difficulty feels lower; and dense lectures.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

Reviews split between mandatory and .

; evidence is inconsistent rather than format-specific.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

About half would , while several online reviews strongly warn others away.

In-person recommendations are warm; online recommendations are weak or hostile.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Tough grader tags and , though some mention rewrites and .

Format shift

Online reviews stress harsh grading more than the positive in-person notes.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Get ready to read, lecture-heavy weeks, and lots of .

Format shift

; online reviews call the load unreasonable more often.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Caring and helpful when students reach out, but online communication lag and dense lectures pull quality down.

Format shift

In-person teaching praise is high; online teaching quality is mixed to poor.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Writing assignments, reading, participation, and .

Format shift

; writing and reading drive grades.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

stimulating lectures, manageable reading for interested students, , and multiple As.

Main concern

Still a lot of reading and .

What students said

“Honestly , but we are here to learn”
21676
“I really loved this class! ... It was a lot of reading but honestly if ethnic studies interests you it's not that bad.”
21676

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

some praise her responsiveness when contacted, but many cite slow , and tough grading.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“ and incredibly picky with every detail of your writing scrutinized worse than any English class Ive taken.”
21676
“ and doesn't tell you why so then you won't know where to improve.”
21676
“ !!!!”
21676

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format; , and assignments rather than stated exam policy.

Writing-focused assessmentLimited exam detail

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; they emphasize reading, lectures, participation, and .

Reading-heavyParticipation mattersEXTRA CREDIT
“It was a lot of reading but honestly if ethnic studies interests you it's not that bad.”
21676

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book, or ; .

Assignment-heavyHarsh writing grading
“ and doesn't tell you why so then you won't know where to improve.”
21676

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Extremely lecture heavy with an overwhelming amount of reading. Lectures are long dense and unnecessarily complicated taking more time than should be.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting online-in-person splits in grading and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

📚

28/100

“Extremely lecture heavy with an overwhelming amount of reading.”

⚖️

32/100

“Professor Carrillo is a .”

💬 Help When You Ask

70/100

“An amazing professor definitely will get back to you when you need anything.”

🏫 In-Person Upside

85/100

“Honestly , but we are here to learn”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing lectures
  • Communication if you Communicate with her she will definitely help you out
  • Lectures are long dense and unnecessarily complicated

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • !!!!
  • and incredibly picky
  • She was chill about allowing me to fix my work

Theme 3

📖 About Workload

  • Get ready to read
  • Lots of homework
  • overwhelming amount of reading

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Six recent detailed reviews with , but the small sample and polarized views limit certainty.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

216766 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1