AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

My Huynh

MATH103 · MATH159 · MATH187 · MATH152 · MATH101C · 101B · MATH153 · MATH101B · MATH191 · MATH181 · MATH186 · MATH101A · MATH104 · 43 lifetime ratings

AI rating
97/100
RMP rating
4.9/5
Take again
95.45%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

and precalc if , and a professor who wants you to pass.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyAmazing lecturesCaringEXTRA CREDITCheat sheets allowedClear grading criteria
  • Students overwhelmingly call her one of the .
  • , and practice tests, with cheat sheets often allowed.
  • Heavy , and accessible office hours make grades highly attainable.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Practice exams mirror tests, cheat sheets are common, low scores get dropped, and plus lenient grading make As very reachable with consistent practice.

Both formats report easy As with practice; .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Course content can be calc-level, but and matched examples make the material feel much easier than typical math.

In-person and online both emphasize clarity; difficulty tags stay moderate rather than brain-burner.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

52/100

, though some terms do not grade attendance strictly.

In-person comments stress coming to class more than online, where recorded lectures help.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Nearly every review urges students to take her and calls her the the college.

Recommendation is strong in both formats; the bulk of .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

Students report lenient grading, , and abundant .

Format shift

Online and in-person .

Workload

Light

74/100

time and practice worksheets more than busywork.

Format shift

A few older tags mention lots of homework, but recent reviews call workload light to average.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

hours, and student-first energy dominate reviews.

Format shift

Excellence holds across online and in-person with only rare outliers.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Quizzes and , but and lecture examples closely.

Format shift

Both formats are test-centered with supportive practice materials.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

37 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students rave about clear lectures, caring , and frequent across calc and precalc.

Main concern

A if you procrastinate practice.

What students said

“She's probably one of the .”
MATH101C
“study her lectures and do the practice tests and should be an easy A”
MATH101B
“allowed cheat sheets for quizzes and tests. good notes and .”
MATH101A

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online sections stay highly rated with , and open-note or .

Main concern

if .

What students said

“She's the ! She's a great teacher who cares about her students, has detailed and easy-to-follow lectures, and is a ”
MATH101B
“ . She also gave some ec opportunities.”
MATH101B
“Her online lectures were also recorded and .”
MATH187

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and practice sets, often with cheat sheets or open notes and recovery options.

Cheat sheets allowedPractice exams match testsOpen-note exams onlineDrop lowest quizExtra credit on exams

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

84/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and mirror practice exams and homework problems.

Cheat sheetsPractice examsDrop lowest quiz
“ and they match the practice.”
MATH101A
“Made sure as the ”
MATH101B

Online

Online exams are described as recorded lectures for review.

Open-note examsLecture-based testsRecorded lectures
“ . She also gave some ec opportunities.”
MATH101B
“Her test questions were based on the and lecture examples.”
MATH187

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is without a doubt the . Kind, understanding, thoughtful, gives clear explanations, doesn't mind you spamming her with questions”

Voice snapshots generated from 44 reviews with strong , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“Honestly the ! She's really funny and kind and cares a lot about her students.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

96/100

“Must take class!”

⚖️

90/100

“She is an and you can have cheat sheets on exams in addition to a formula sheet.”

📘

84/100

“ if you go over her lecture notes and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and is willing to work with you.
  • her
  • She really wants the

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • should be an easy A
  • She gives lots of extra credits too.
  • and

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • I have genuinely never seen her without a smile.
  • Also she loves labubus.
  • was super accommodating to students who got COVID during the semester.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

44

Recent reviews read by the AI

43

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-four detailed, highly consistent reviews across many courses and years, with ~95% would-take-again and dense concrete evidence.

Inside 44 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 542
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH101A8 reviews
MATH101B8 reviews
MATH101C8 reviews
MATH1876 reviews
MATH1523 reviews
Show 8 more courses
MATH1042 reviews
MATH1592 reviews
MATH1862 reviews
101B1 review
MATH1031 review
MATH1531 review
MATH1811 review
MATH1911 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

42 reported outcomes

A range

34

A+ 15 · A 17 · A- 2

B range

7

B+ 4 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1