AI Rate Professor

English

Perri Gallagher

ENG101C · ENGL101C · 101A · ENGL101A · 101C · ENG105 · ENG101 · ENGLISH · ENG101A · 97 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
17.31%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Avoid if another English professor is available; communication and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHarsh opaque gradingSlow or no feedbackUnresponsive emailsAI detection disputesDisorganized course management
  • Most students report , and
  • Grades often appear late; some never know standing until end of term
  • A small minority pass fine and like her lectures, but the

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Content is not always hard, but and 1/10-style scores make As unreliable.

A few older or in-person students report easy As; recent online reviews mostly report harsh, unexplained scores.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Readings and essays are ordinary English work; the pain is clarity and .

Online students more often call instructions convoluted; some in-person students say the work volume is average.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

62/100

Many online and , though some require participation.

; some in-person sections still push showing up for small assignments.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

17/100

Take-again rate is very low and most .

Avoid language is strongest online, but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

14/100

Students report unexplained 1/10s, AI false flags, and .

Format shift

Online AI-detection disputes dominate recent reviews; .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Several essays, readings, discussions, and timed writing; volume is moderate but .

Format shift

Online often adds timed essays and last-minute posts; .

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

Dominant themes are no , and unhelpful or missing feedback.

Format shift

A minority of in-person students praise lectures; online reviews are overwhelmingly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Essays, timed writing, discussions, and ; lectures are often minimal online.

Format shift

Online is assignment-centric with little lecture; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and harsh, though a few praise lectures and extensions.

Main concern

, and tough essay grades without guidance.

What students said

“ and cancelled class once a week, her lectures were confusing and unhelpful.”
ENG101C
“ so low.”
ENG101A

Remote format

Online

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

AI flags, ignored emails, vague prompts, and .

Main concern

, and essays graded only after it is too late to recover.

What students said

“I beg you not to take this professor. and doesn't care to clarify anything you did wrong.”
101A
“Most of the grade is determined by 3 essays that she didn't even grade until after the final”
101C

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment feels high-risk because of timed essays, harsh scoring, and .

Timed essaysAI detectionLate grade releaseLittle or no feedback

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention timed midterm and , and .

Timed midterm and final essaysMultiple papersPop quizzes
“4 essays in class, 1 midterm 1 final essay (both timed).”
ENGL101C

Online

Online reviews cite timed essays, AI detection, vague prompts, and .

Timed essaysAI detectionDelayed grades
“She also uses AI to detect for AI in your work. She does not care if you have evidence to prove your innocence if you happen to be falsely flagged.”
101A
“Lot of .”
ENGL101C

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I beg you not to take this professor. and doesn't care to clarify anything you did wrong.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting grading opacity, communication failure, and . Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Recommendation Reality

17/100

“”

⚖️

14/100

“She never makes it clear what she wants written for .”

🤖 AI Detection Pain

18/100

“Even your hand written things would pop up as AI.”

🕒

20/100

“Have to wait till last week for .”

Theme 1

📧 About Communication

  • I had to send 20 emails to receive one.
  • she never responded to emails sent asking for .
  • Doesn't leave comments on grades and will leave you wondering what you did wrong.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Average grade she gave on essays was a 55.
  • She constantly gives out 1/10s n that makes it impossible to recover your grade from that.
  • she just looks for opportunities to penalize you.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Course Management

  • , grades late
  • .
  • Mutes/doesn't publish grades ... until the last min.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

97

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews with a large quality-1 cluster and repeated themes of , and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 59
3 out of 512
2 out of 58
1 out of 562

Course coverage

101A15 reviews
101C10 reviews
ENG101C9 reviews
ENG101A7 reviews
ENGL101C3 reviews
Show 4 more courses
ENG1012 reviews
ENGL101A2 reviews
ENG1051 review
ENGLISH1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

47 reported outcomes

A range

13

A+ 2 · A 9 · A- 2

B range

10

B+ 6 · B 4

C range

11

C+ 2 · C 8 · C- 1

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

10

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 4 · Rather not say 2