AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Revathi Sundaresan

MATH188 · MATH159 · MATH902 · MATH152 · MATH153 · 101A · MATH101B · MATH181 · MATH186 · MATH101A · MATH15907 · 52 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
62.75%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you will study hard for tests and can keep up with fast lectures; skip if you need an easy A or heavy support.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTest HeavyTough GraderPolarizing LecturesExtra Credit GiverHilarious When It Clicks
  • some students call her the while others fail or drop.
  • and finals with limited notes and little forgiveness if .
  • thin online sample.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Even motivated students report hard closed-note tests and .

Nearly all grade-path evidence is in person; online sample is too small to change the picture.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Calculus and related courses feel fast, formula-heavy, and .

In-person reviews dominate; .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

as optional while others punish skips with .

In-person comments disagree on strictness; online hybrid reviews report required meetings.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

About six in ten would take again, with strong fans and .

In-person opinions split; the few online reviews lean negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

36/100

, and high test weight leave little room for .

Format shift

Some in-person students still report partial credit, corrections, or .

Workload

Moderate

42/100

but ; outside study for tests is the real load.

Format shift

In-person Calc comments mention heavy studying; .

Teaching experience

Average

60/100

Praise for and humor sits beside complaints about accent, speed, and messy board work.

Format shift

In-person is mixed but richer; online delivery is widely disliked in the small sample.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Students repeatedly say midterms and .

Format shift

Both formats emphasize tests; as a smaller cushion.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

47 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

many praise funny caring lectures and curves, while , and hard-to-follow pace.

Main concern

and inconsistent lecture clarity can tank strong math students.

What students said

“She is simply the .”
MATH101A
“She doesn't allow any note cards for and doesn't give study guides either.”
MATH101A
“shes so sweet but bro she was a terrible teacher.”
MATH101A

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

weak remote lectures, peer-only Zoom help, and .

Main concern

Online delivery is described as minimal teaching with .

What students said

“This Prof offers and puts you in a zoom room with another student to answer your questions rather than answer them herself.”
MATH15907
“MUST study by yourself to fully understand concept, since many of the subject she skims over”
MATH186

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are high-stakes, often closed-note, and can feel harder than class practice.

Closed NotesNo Study Guides OftenMemorize FormulasTest HeavyPossible Curve

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and formula sheets and require heavy memorization.

No Note CardsNo Formula SheetsHard Last ProblemsPartial Credit Sometimes
“She doesn't allow any note cards for and doesn't give study guides either.”
MATH101A
“She also doesn't allow sheets with formulas do you have to memorize .”
MATH101A

Online

Limited online evidence points to test-heavy courses with .

Test HeavySelf-Study Required
“ , so if you screw up on one test, your grade would be heavily reflected by it.”
MATH186

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's a and 50% of your grade is made up of the midterms. However, she is the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews with heavy in-person coverage, . Credibility rating: High.

⚖️ Polarizing Outcomes

55/100

“shes so sweet but bro she was a terrible teacher.”

📝

32/100

“She doesn't allow any note cards for and doesn't give study guides either.”

🌟 When It Works

85/100

“She is simply the .”

😂 Personality

70/100

“Her teaching style was hilarious, focus in lecture and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Ms. and goes through lots of examples in class.
  • Her lectures are all over the place.
  • She connects all calculus concepts to physics.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Extremely test heavy meaning you need 85% or .
  • She .
  • Easy A as long as you do your work.

Theme 3

⚠️ Red Flags

  • No one in the class can understand a single word she says.
  • .
  • She talks down to all her students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

52

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews over many years show a stable but polarized pattern; online evidence is thin so .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 518
4 out of 516
3 out of 53
2 out of 57
1 out of 58

Course coverage

MATH101A16 reviews
MATH15913 reviews
MATH1526 reviews
MATH1864 reviews
MATH1813 reviews
Show 6 more courses
101A2 reviews
MATH1882 reviews
MATH101B1 review
MATH1531 review
MATH159071 review
MATH9021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

45 reported outcomes

A range

20

A+ 9 · A 11

B range

11

B+ 1 · B 8 · B- 2

C range

4

C+ 1 · C 3

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 4 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2