AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Mabel Moreno

MATH152 · MATH168 · MATH110 · MATH151 · MATH186 · MATH156 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.4/5
Take again
10%
Difficulty
4.7

The decision

unless you already know the material cold and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHarsh GraderCannot TeachThick AccentSelf-Teach RequiredTest Heavy
  • Nearly every and lectures are unintelligible.
  • and and low grades.
  • Students report teaching themselves on YouTube or Khan Academy to survive.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

, and poor teaching make an A extremely hard for most students.

.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

14/100

Content feels extremely hard and students must self-teach.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

as mandatory and tags warn that skipping means you will not pass.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Almost all students and report dropping or failing.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Students call her a answers.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Tags and comments repeatedly cite lots of , and test-heavy structure.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Students say she cannot teach, reads without explaining, and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Courses are described as to prepare students.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person math classes are widely described as , and lecture-unreadable due to accent and .

Main concern

Students cannot follow lectures and risk failing despite effort.

What students said

“ .”
math110
“If you are taking her classes, get ready to teach yourself. Fully.”
MATH151
“She really does not know how to teach.”
MATH186

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments feel high-stakes and harsh with .

Test HeavyTough GraderIn-Person Exams

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and little clarity on expectations.

Test HeavyTough Grader
“ .”
math110
“She is a as well, and the material is hard without a good enough teacher.”
MATH151

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I took stats with her and it was horrible. She is a and has a super thick accent so that can be troublesome. I also found it super with her lessons and her . I truly did not like this class and she made it so incredibly hard. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 in-person reviews spanning 2016-2025, highlighting consistent themes of unintelligible teaching and . Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Teaching Quality

12/100

“She really does not know how to teach.”

📉 Recommendation

8/100

“Stay away from her and pick someone else!”

⚖️

15/100

“She grades unequally and very harsh.”

📚

18/100

“majority of my studies is either looking up tutorials on YouTube or going on Khan Academy.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • lectures were her just reading something with
  • Doesn't use any proper terms and you wont understand anything
  • All i can understand is, over here over there

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She is a and has a super thick accent
  • more than half of the class has dropped
  • If you aren't in her good side, get ready to fail.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Outcomes

  • I would
  • You basically teach yourself for this class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Ten detailed reviews spanning 2016-2025 show strong consistency on poor teaching and .

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 59

Course coverage

MATH1513 reviews
math1102 reviews
MATH1522 reviews
MATH1561 review
MATH1681 review
Show 1 more courses
MATH1861 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 3