AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Rose-Margaret Itua

ENGI120 · ENGI101 · ENGI130 · 101A · ENGIN101 · 32 lifetime ratings

AI rating
66/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
54.17%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Good pick for intro engineering if and can self-manage; less ideal if you need tight organization and .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyGroup-project heavyInspirational for engineeringInconsistent organizationLabs over lecturesEasy A for many
  • ENGI101 often feels easy with group labs/projects and limited exams, and many still report A grades.
  • Students praise inspiration and career motivation but , and slow replies.
  • Online and some advanced sections feel more disorganized and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Many students report easy As from group projects and , though .

; online still easy for many but .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Intro content and pressure mainly from lab logistics rather than abstract theory.

ENGI130 and some technical labs raise difficulty above pure ENGI101 ease.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

and project work, though some sections report optional attendance.

; online is more asynchronous but .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

54/100

Recommended for motivated intro students seeking inspiration and projects, not for those needing highly structured lectures and .

In-person ENGI101 lean more recommend; online and ENGI130 are more mixed or negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

65/100

Many call her an , but others note arbitrary point deductions and never giving full scores.

Format shift

; online has more arbitrary-deduction complaints.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Homework is often light, but group labs, presentations, and .

Format shift

Online group coordination .

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Inspiration and care are real strengths, but lectures, organization, and and formats.

Format shift

In-person inspiration ratings are stronger; online organization and accessibility draw more criticism.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Group labs, projects, and presentations dominate grades, with focus.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize projects; and a midterm.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

25 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person ENGI101 is widely seen as approachable and , though some dislike long lectures, time-crunched labs, or picky presentation grading.

Main concern

, and lectures that feel off-topic or low value for some.

What students said

“There were only 2 easy tests. A very simple and smooth class.”
ENGI101
“this engineering class is the easiest class I've ever taken. , however, you .”
101A
“If you're someone that doesn't work well under pressure, you'll hate this class.”
ENGI101

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections can still and , but students often cite outdated materials, unclear instructions, and hard-to-reach communication.

Main concern

, and group-lab coordination without strong guidance.

What students said

“Introduction to Engineering is the class Im taking and it's mainly consist of team projects and reading assignments. There are only the midterm and .”
ENGI101
“The , and many of us were confused 90% of the time. However, the ”
ENGI130
“This professor is unreachable online, and ”
ENGI101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly project and or midterm-style checks in many sections.

Few easy testsGroup labsProject presentationsLimited finals in some terms

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

group labs and presentations; closed-book exam strictness is not a major theme.

Two easy testsGroup labsPresentationsMultiple choice quizzes in older terms
“There were only 2 easy tests. A very simple and smooth class.”
ENGI101
“a few quizzes(all multiple choice), midterm(multiple choice and .”
ENGI101

Online

Online reviews mention easy midterm and ; proctoring tools are not clearly described.

Easy midterm and finalTeam projectsReading assignments
“There are only the midterm and . Overall taking this class is an easy grade”
ENGI101
“the class is very easy up until the , and there are .”
ENGI101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“One of the easiest class to take This class is very easy to follow and doesn't use a real textbook. Most of the work is simple in-class projects”

Voice snapshots generated from 32 , and organization friction. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Easy Intro Grade

78/100

“SUPER EASY A ...”

🛠️

70/100

“You will definitely get a lot of experience about the projects from her class. You will have to do a lot of team work.”

📋 Organization Gaps

40/100

“Discrepancies between instruction given in class and Canvas. No feedback for labs 3 and 4”

💡 Inspiration Factor

72/100

“She will inspire you to become an engineer who cares for humanity big time.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She cares deeply for her students and does a lot to facilitate student success.
  • Her lectures aren't helpful or valuable, she often brings attention to her success.
  • except long lecture, her class is really fun.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Overall taking this class is an easy grade
  • I Also think she graded too hard for an introductory engineering class.
  • if you work just a bit hard you get A period.

Theme 3

🧪 About Labs and Projects

  • so good luck!
  • the class is like 20% lecture and 80% lab projects.
  • as we had to coordinate with labmates ourselves

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

32

Recent reviews read by the AI

32

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

32 reviews from 2013-2026 cover both formats with , and organization themes, though online sample is smaller.

Inside 32 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 59
3 out of 57
2 out of 53
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ENGI10124 reviews
ENGI1304 reviews
ENGIN1012 reviews
101A1 review
ENGI1201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

28 reported outcomes

A range

18

A+ 4 · A 14

B range

7

B+ 3 · B 4

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2