AI Rate Professor

English

Cecile Davila

ENG151B · ENGL163 · 151A151B · ENGLISH151 · 151RW · ENGL151B · ENG163 · ENGL101A · 101A · ENGL151RW · ENGL101 · ENG101A · 96 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
15.09%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Avoid Cecile Davila unless you already write , and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderUnclear RubricsRude Classroom ToneSo Many PapersInconsistent Feedback
  • Most students and zeros for minor or disputed issues.
  • Many describe rude or condescending interactions that damage confidence and mental health.
  • A minority say she helps if , but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

, and frequent zeros make an A feel effortful and uncertain even for strong writers.

Both formats report harsh grading, but and zero partial credit more strongly.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Content is and heavy papers make the experience feel much harder.

and class shame; online reviews emphasize strict textbook-matching and confusion.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and absences can hurt the grade.

In-person evidence is overwhelmingly mandatory; a as not mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

16/100

Would-take-again is about 15 percent and the dominant student .

Both formats are mostly negative, with only a small older positive minority in each.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

14/100

Students repeatedly report tough grading, inconsistent points, and .

Format shift

and in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

26/100

So , and frequent homework dominate the comments.

Format shift

; in-person also stresses participation and pop quizzes.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

, and rude, though a small minority found her feedback useful when they sought constant help.

Format shift

In-person negativity is denser; online also reports incoherent emails and .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Essays and , quizzes, and some tests also mentioned.

Format shift

Both formats center writing assignments more than traditional exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

44 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews dominate and paint a pattern of , and unpredictable zeros.

Main concern

unable to improve.

What students said

“ + disorganized”
101A
“ . if you care about your .”
ENG101A
“She repeatedly shamed people for not knowing an answer.”
101A
“The class is not hard, It's the teacher who ruins it.”
ENG101A

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online sections are mostly described as , and and little partial credit.

Main concern

Students report , and little support online.

What students said

“ ; FOLLOW THE TEXTBOOK DEFINITIONS EXACTLY otherwise she .”
101A
“It's almost like she enjoys failing her students.”
101A
“No matter how hard you work on your essay or where you failed.”
ENGL101A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on essays and papers with some quizzes and tests; reviews do .

Essay HeavyPop QuizzesParticipation GradedTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and paper-heavy finals more than a single standard exam policy.

Pop QuizzesTest HeavySo Many PapersParticipation Matters
“essays are worth 50% of your grade”
ENG101A
“Beware of pop quizzes”
101A
“ got a B no matter the quality.”
ENG101A

Online

Online comments and discussion answers rather than a clearly documented exam proctoring setup.

Essay HeavyStrict GradingDiscussion Posts
“Try your , because if you slip up she doesn't give any partial credit.”
101A
“No matter how hard you work on your essay or where you failed.”
ENGL101A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you care about your .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting grading fairness, classroom climate, and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Recommendation Rate

16/100

“ . IF POSSIBLE.”

⚖️

14/100

“ + disorganized”

😠 Classroom Climate

20/100

“She repeatedly shamed people for not knowing an answer.”

📝 Workload Reality

26/100

“There's so ... essay are worth 50% of your grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and uninspiring
  • The class is not hard, It's the teacher who ruins it.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Gave me 0 on an assignment all because I didn't number my answers.
  • People I knew... get a 90-100%, but I would do everything she asked and get a 50-60%.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She was one of the rudest teachers i've ever met.
  • Always vague in instructions and consistently condescending.
  • Very rude teacher and LOVES to hold grudges

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

96

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed reviews across several years show a consistent majority pattern of and poor classroom climate.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 513
3 out of 56
2 out of 510
1 out of 550

Course coverage

101A19 reviews
ENG101A15 reviews
151RW3 reviews
ENGL101A3 reviews
151A151B2 reviews
Show 7 more courses
ENG1632 reviews
ENG151B1 review
ENGL1011 review
ENGL151B1 review
ENGL151RW1 review
ENGL1631 review
ENGLISH1511 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

45 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 3 · A 3

B range

9

B+ 2 · B 5 · B- 2

C range

11

C+ 2 · C 6 · C- 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

18

Drop/Withdrawal 8 · Not sure yet 4 · Rather not say 6