AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Kelley Liu

CHEM101A · CHEM109 · CHEM101B · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
12.5%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Avoid if ; only take if and tolerate a tough classroom tone.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing LecturesTough GraderLots of HomeworkShort-TemperedMust Self-Study
  • Lectures are widely described as , so students must teach themselves.
  • Heavy homework and .
  • Several students report brusque or disrespectful interactions when asking questions.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

and dropped scores help a bit, but , and many C/D reports mean an A still takes serious self-study and grind.

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Concept-heavy chemistry with fast or and self-teaching.

; there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

, and missing class still leaves you lost because lectures are the .

; there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

to pick anyone else.

; there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Tough-grader tags dominate; , but overall marks stay hard-earned.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Lots of homework, reading, labs, and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students repeatedly say lectures confuse more than they teach and questions often get unhelpful or hostile replies.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Test-heavy structure with quizzes and concept exams; homework and labs still matter but .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and lecture-weak, with heavy reading, tests, and homework plus tense Q&A. and dropped low scores help some, but many still land C/D ranges.

Main concern

and short-tempered responses to questions.

What students said

“I didn't learn anything at all from her. It was just waste of my time.”
CHEM101B
“Quite literally the .”
CHEM109
“Class average was a C as she is incapable of teaching.”
CHEM101A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; and dropped scores softens risk slightly but content is still demanding.

Concept-Heavy TestsPartial Credit if You Write SomethingExtra Credit on Some ExamsDrop Lowest Test/Quiz

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person tests emphasize concepts over pure memorization; never leave blanks and use when offered.

Concept-Heavy TestsExtra CreditDrop Lowest Score
“ as she expects to see how good the students understand the material in class.”
CHEM101B
“Never leave questions blank, WRITE SOMETHING for .”
CHEM101B

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“save yourself and ”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 in-person reviews, highlighting teaching clarity, workload, and classroom tone. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Quality

18/100

“I didn't learn anything at all from her. It was just waste of my time.”

🚫 Recommendation

15/100

“ but her.”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“she assigns absurd amounts of work while not publishing grades for weeks”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • students can't really get what she is trying to say
  • Lectures are nearly useless
  • You will be teaching yourself for the duration of the course

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Class average was a C
  • Good

Theme 3

😤 About Classroom Tone

  • She will get angry if you try to ask questions
  • she can be very short tempered
  • Actually laughs at her students when they

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Eight detailed in-person reviews from 2020-2023 align strongly on poor teaching, but the sample is still modest and grade data is incomplete.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 55

Course coverage

CHEM101A3 reviews
CHEM101B3 reviews
CHEM1092 reviews

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1