AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Catalina Chesley

ANTHR102 · ANTH102 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
44/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Mixed bag with sparse data; expect high expectations and uneven clarity, so proceed only if you want challenging anthro content.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHigh expectationsLecture heavySingles out studentsInexperienced early careerInteresting topics
  • Recent review praises interesting material and
  • and singling out students
  • Small sample spans many years with mixed quality scores

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Reported B+ with high expectations and heavy material; no evidence of free or easy A.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Students say too much material was covered and difficulty ratings skew mid-to-high.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

; others do not contradict strict presence.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

One recent student would take her again, but and classroom dynamics.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Only one posted B+ and high expectations; .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Students describe covering too much material, lecture-heavy pace, and group projects.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Passion is noted, but , and singling out students.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews mention lecture-heavy teaching and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and interesting but teaching clarity and classroom fairness draw strong complaints from older students.

Main concern

Students report being singled out and .

What students said

“Very high expectations. Covered too much material. Topics very interesting.”
ANTH102
“she singles out students and ignores those who actually know the material”
ANTHR102
“This teacher was passionate about the subject, but was not great at teaching it.”
ANTH102

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments focus on expectations and classroom .

“She wasn't thorough in her expectations.”
ANTH102

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This teacher was passionate about the subject, but was not great at teaching it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews spanning 2010-2023; credibility rating: Low.

📚 Content Load

32/100

“Very high expectations. Covered too much material. Topics very interesting.”

🗣️ Classroom Fairness

30/100

“she singles out students and ignores those who actually know the material”

🎓 Teaching Clarity

38/100

“ ... at times she seemed like she didn't know what she was talking about”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • passionate about the subject, but was not great at teaching it
  • ... it was very frustrating
  • we were her guinea pigs

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Very high expectations. Covered too much material
  • Topics very interesting
  • B+

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews spanning 2010-2023 with limited grade detail and inconsistent tone reduce confidence.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ANTH1022 reviews
ANTHR1021 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values