AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Nha-Huyen Nguyen

MATH101 · MATH159 · MATH152 · MATH153 · MATH152A · MATH101B · MATH181 · MATH201 · MATH151 · MATH156 · MATH101A · 35 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
65.22%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you will attend and study hard; .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear lectures in personTest heavyLots of homeworkAccessible outside classSkip class and fail
  • and many students praise her help outside class.
  • Online asynchronous MATH101B is poorly supported with and weak prep.
  • Attendance and steady study matter; .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

In person, notes, homework practice, and ; online and some calc sections require heavy test performance.

Online reviews paint a much harder path to A; in-person stats and some lower courses report easier As with practice.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

and test-focused stats that many call tough.

Online async MATH101B is described as extremely hard; in-person difficulty varies by course.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Many tags and comments say skip class and you will not pass, though a as not mandatory.

Evidence is mostly in person; online was asynchronous with .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

66/100

and strong in-person praise, offset by harsh online reviews and .

In-person recommendations dominate; all three online reviews advise against the async format.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Some students get drops, , and clear criteria; others call her a .

Format shift

; in person is more mixed.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Lots of and test heaviness, and weekly work show up often across courses.

Format shift

and .

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

, and office-hour help; online teaching support is weak.

Format shift

In person is largely positive; online is described as no real teaching.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Grades lean heavily on tests and .

Format shift

Online comments stress test-heavy grading with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Most students call her knowledgeable and organized; stats and some calc sections can feel fair with drops and practice, but calculus can be tough and test-heavy.

Main concern

Skip class and you will struggle; .

What students said

“She is the ”
MATH101B
“The lectures are easily to follow and understand”
MATH156
“overall easy A if ”
MATH181

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Asynchronous MATH101B feels self-taught: , and .

Main concern

while provided videos and reviews do not prepare students well.

What students said

“ ”
MATH101B
“She has of her own and only provides the textbook and videos of other people”
MATH101B
“the textbook and videos she offers is not enough for the ”
MATH101B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams drive the grade; , while others feel picky and hard.

Test heavyLowest test dropCheat sheet sometimes allowedTwo tries on exams in some sectionsHard quizzes and tests

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person exams are often hard and weighted heavily, but sheet.

Lowest test droppedCheat sheet allowed on some examsTwo tries on examsHard tests
“A cheated and she dropped the lowest”
MATH101B
“You !”
MATH159
“ of the semester”
MATH156

Online

Online async MATH101B is graded heavily on hard tests with weak review prep; .

Test heavyGrade dependent on testsWeak test reviews
“Grade ”
MATH101B
“The for exams”
MATH101B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is the . She knows the material so well, quickly answers your questions.”

Voice snapshots generated from 35 reviews (3 online, 32 in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“The lectures are easily to follow and understand. She goes over the example problems really well”

💻 Online Format Warning

25/100

“Maybe she's better in person but .”

📝

72/100

“Grade .”

👍 Recommendation Split

66/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She knows her material and
  • and

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • overall easy A if
  • It's a hard class being Calculus
  • Passing her class is difficult and most of your grade is all you

Theme 3

💻 About Online vs In Person

  • She has of her own

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

35

Recent reviews read by the AI

35

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

35 reviews spanning many years with consistent , and online weakness support high confidence.

Inside 35 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 510
3 out of 56
2 out of 56
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH101A8 reviews
MATH1598 reviews
MATH101B4 reviews
MATH1564 reviews
MATH1523 reviews
Show 6 more courses
MATH1512 reviews
MATH1532 reviews
MATH1011 review
MATH152A1 review
MATH1811 review
MATH2011 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

20 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 1 · A 7

B range

9

B+ 1 · B 6 · B- 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2