AI Rate Professor

Computer Applications

Ravi Namboori

CNET162 · CNET175 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if and tolerate disorganization; many students advise avoiding.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedInspirational for someLate gradingSelf-study requiredPolarizing
  • Experience is highly polarized between inspirational and disastrous
  • Several students say lectures miss core material and force self-teaching
  • and last-minute or

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Some say few graded items, but and chaos that make a clean A unreliable.

Online student got an A easily; In person reports warn about unfair exams and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is not described as brain-melting, but missing instruction and vague real-world problems raise the real challenge.

Online felt moderate; In person difficulty is driven more by poor delivery than dense theory.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

participation, and sometimes optional.

Online CNET175 reported mandatory attendance; In person comments mix optional attendance with .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

About half the , but .

The single Online review is positive; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

42/100

One tag says graded by few things, but and .

Format shift

Online student reported an A; In person students criticize delayed and .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload is not always heavy, but students .

Format shift

Online review does not stress load; In person students report catching up after lag and self-teaching AWS.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Too many students say he is off-topic, unorganized, or fails to teach the actual tools.

Format shift

Online felt okay; In person reviews drive the poor teaching score.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Exams and last-second finals dominate .

Format shift

In ; Online review gives little assessment detail.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

some call him smart and inspirational, others say he never teaches, grades late, and .

Main concern

, and off-topic lectures.

What students said

“Exam has 75% material never discussed even once”
CNET175
“Avoid. .”
CNET162
“Did not learn a single thing in his class.”
CNET162

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One Online student found CNET175 kind of good, earned an A, and .

Main concern

Only one brief Online comment, so .

What students said

“Kinda good one”
CNET175

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are risky because students report large amounts of never-taught material and improvised finals.

Untaught exam materialLast-second finalSelf-research required

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person students report exams with mostly undiscussed material and a .

Untaught exam materialLast-second final
“Exam has 75% material never discussed even once, contradicting his own promises”
CNET175
“he made up a second because he did not TEACH”
CNET162

Online

Online review .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Avoid. . Did not learn a single thing in his class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews (1 Online, 5 In person), highlighting polarization between inspiration and chaos. Credibility rating: Medium.

💥 Teaching Disaster Risk

34/100

“Extremely unhelpful and EXTREMELY(!) disorganized”

📚

30/100

“His lectures do not cover actually how to use anything in AWS - you will have to look this up yourself.”

⚡ Polarizing Inspiration

70/100

“A new way to teach class and he is very knowledgable for the subject.”

👎 Recommendation Split

48/100

“ and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he basically just talked about his job position
  • Amazing lectures
  • Very smart.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Doesn't grade a
  • GRADED BY FEW THINGS
  • Exam has 75% material never discussed even once

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization

  • EXTREMELY(!) disorganized
  • because he forgot
  • Lagged behind syllabus

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews across 2016-2022 with detailed negatives and some positives, but opinions are highly split.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CNET1624 reviews
CNET1752 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values