AI Rate Professor

English

Ruth De Larios

ENGLISH16203 · ENG151B · ENGL163 · ENG162 · 151RW · ENGL151B · 151B · ENGLISH101C · 151B05162 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Avoid if ; only take her if and stay perfectly on top of labs and attendance.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing TeachingStrict GraderUnorganizedMandatory AttendanceOff-Topic Lectures
  • Many students say she teaches little and .
  • and strict; one missed detail or .
  • Attendance and ; missing either risks being dropped or failing.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Picky deductions, confusing criteria, and is done.

Evidence ; the one online review also signals poor outcomes.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is standard English writing and reading, but confusing delivery and alone.

In-person comments dominate; online also describes learning nothing from lectures.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Multiple students say and if you miss class.

; online attendance was not clearly specified.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Would-take-again is 0% and recent .

Both the online review and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students report assignment can collapse a solid grade.

Format shift

; online also notes being graded by few things.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Weekly quizzes, ELC modules, Pearson work, labs, and .

Format shift

Workload complaints are strongest in in-person English sections.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Dominant theme is confusing, unorganized lectures, off-topic stories, and little actual teaching.

Format shift

Online and in-person both criticize teaching quality; a .

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

, and participation rather than exams alone.

Format shift

Assessment mix is described mostly in in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person students repeatedly call her unorganized, forgetful, and , and , though a few older reviews found her friendly or helpful.

Main concern

, and mandatory attendance with little payoff from lectures.

What students said

“ . She doesn't know how to teach and do absolute nothing in class. .”
151RW
“This teacher is one of the worst teachers at Ohlone college. !!!!”
ENG162
“she will literally mark you down 10 points on a between paraghrapshs”
151B05162

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review calls her a terrible teacher who teaches nothing, makes excuses, and .

Main concern

You learn almost nothing from instruction and .

What students said

“TERRIBLE teacher. She often makes excuses for not admitting her mistakes. She actually teaches nothing, you need to work on your own for the most of the time.”
151B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and labs; reviews do not clearly prove special proctoring rules.

Weekly QuizzesEssay RedosIn-Class DiscussionLab Modules

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person, students mention weekly quizzes, essays with possible redos, and lab work; .

Weekly QuizzesEssay RedosLab Work
“ and .”
ENGL163
“She is a , but she allows students to redo the essay.”
ENGLISH101C

Online

Online review .

Graded by few things
“You will learn NOTHING in her class. !!!”
151B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . She doesn't know how to teach and do absolute nothing in class. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews spanning 2012-2021, highlighting teaching chaos and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫

22/100

“100% DO NOT recommend her, I don't even want to see her face again.”

📚

32/100

“Her teaching techniques are very confusing and .”

✏️

28/100

“she will literally mark you down 10 points on a between paraghrapshs”

📌

12/100

“if you . Her rules are very strict.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She actually teaches nothing, you need to work on your own for the most of the time.
  • she forgets everything and leaves all the work behind.
  • and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You aren't able to do well in her class if she doesn't like you.
  • .
  • She's also a .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She has a great sense of humor; .
  • Nice lady, Horrible professor.
  • She often treats us like children in grade school.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen reviews span many years with consistent negative themes, but older positives and sparse grade data keep credibility below high.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 54
3 out of 54
2 out of 53
1 out of 54

Course coverage

151B4 reviews
ENG1623 reviews
ENGLISH101C3 reviews
151B051621 review
151RW1 review
Show 5 more courses
1621 review
ENG151B1 review
ENGL151B1 review
ENGL1631 review
ENGLISH162031 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1