AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Shreeyukta Singh

101B · CHEM101B · CHEM101A · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid unless you have no alternative and are ready for a .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderHeavy HomeworkNot Enough Exam TimeRude To StudentsTest Heavy
  • Majority of 18 reviews rate her 1/5 and urge students to wait for another professor.
  • Common complaints , and too little time on quizzes and exams.
  • A smaller set of , and help for students who stay on top of work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Some earn A with intense study and , but and time pressure make an A feel costly.

; a few positive in-person and online reviews mention and resubmits.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

Fast 8-week , and complex chem content make the course intellectually hard.

Online and and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

14/100

and skip-class tags warn you will not pass.

and in person.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most students explicitly say stay away or wait a semester despite a minority of strong defenders.

; positives cluster in a few earlier reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Repeated tough-grader reports, large deductions for small errors, and .

Format shift

; a minority call her fair with .

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Lots of , and constant testing overwhelm many students.

Format shift

Heavy load is consistent online and in person.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

; a smaller group praises humor and feedback.

Format shift

Negatives dominate both formats; positives exist but are outnumbered.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Test-heavy with frequent quizzes and exams that require shown work and strict timing.

Format shift

Test pressure is reported online and in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person majority call her rude, unprofessional, and stress-inducing, though a few students found and if they prepared hard.

Main concern

Personal remarks, humiliation, rigid deadlines, and a .

What students said

“Professor Singh was the life.”
CHEM101B
“Never enough time for . Unreasonable. Not understanding. Rude rude rude!!!”
CHEM101B

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online CHEM101B reviews are mostly negative about unclear instructions, , and mean tone, with a couple early-pandemic positives about resubmits.

Main concern

, and punitive grading for tiny mistakes.

What students said

“For tests and and 50% was graded based on work.”
CHEM101B
“Even if you get all the answers right on a off a huge chunk of .”
CHEM101B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are time-crunched, work-shown graded, and often described as unreasonable.

Never enough timeMust show workWeekly quizzesTough point deductions

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

time, weekly testing, and must-show-work toughness.

Never enough time for examsWeekly quizzesMust show work on exams
“Never enough time for .”
CHEM101B
“ . Tough but .”
CHEM101B

Online

Online students report not enough time on tests and quizzes and large deductions for small mistakes.

Not enough time50% graded on workHarsh quiz deductions
“For tests and and 50% was graded based on work.”
CHEM101B
“Even if you get all the answers right on a off a huge chunk of .”
CHEM101B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do yourself a . She's rude, she does not care, and even during COVID-19, she cares even less.”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 CHEM reviews, weighting the and while noting minority praise. Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Recommendation Rate

28/100

“ . By far one of the most disrespectful and disingenuous teachers I've ever had.”

⚖️

22/100

“Even if you get all the answers right on a off a huge chunk of .”

⏱️

22/100

“For tests and and 50% was graded based on work.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her handwriting and talking was hard to understand during lectures
  • Terrible. She has long power points that she does a horrible job at explaining.
  • Amazing teacher with good sense of humor.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Lots of homework
  • Chem101B is not a class you can just coast through

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Climate

  • She is rude and uncaring to her students.
  • Likes to humiliate students in front of the whole class.
  • Rude rude rude!!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Eighteen reviews with broad time coverage, rich detail, and a .

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 511

Course coverage

CHEM101B12 reviews
101B5 reviews
CHEM101A1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 4

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

8

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 1