AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Hung Dinh

CALCULUSA · MATH188 · MA153 · MATH101 · MATH187 · ALG152 · MAT152 · MATH152 · MATH2 · MATH12 · MATH181 · MATH166 · PRECAL · MATH153 · MATH186 · MATH156 · MATH101A · MTH188 · 55 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Only take him if and ; many students advise picking another professor.

Best fit · Self Taught ProLots of HomeworkUnclear LecturesPolarizingTough TestsSelf-Teach Required
  • Many students call lectures unclear, rushed, or disorganized and .
  • Workload is heavy with and frequent pressure to keep up.
  • A minority praise him as caring and fair if you ask questions and do the work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Some older reviews say do the homework and an A is realistic, but many report , and low class averages.

; in-person evidence is more mixed and often describes hard exams.

Is the course easy?

Standard

44/100

Content is standard precalc or algebra difficulty, but fast pacing and material alone.

Most ; online reviews focus more on volume of work.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and warn that skipping hurts you or that participation is tracked.

; online evidence is thin and mixed.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Would-take-again is about 25 percent and .

A few strong in-person and online yes votes exist, but the bulk of both formats still lean against taking him.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Some students call him an if work is done his way, while others call him a and clarity.

Format shift

Positive lenient-grader comments are mostly older in-person reviews; newer comments skew tougher.

Workload

Heavy

26/100

Lots of , and duplicated problem sets show up constantly across courses.

Format shift

Online reviews also report extremely long homework sets, matching the in-person heavy-load pattern.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Positive pockets exist, but the dominant pattern is , interruptions, accent/clarity issues, and self-teaching.

Format shift

In-person criticism is far denser; sparse online reviews also call instruction vague and disorganized.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Homework and online practice matter a lot, but and .

Format shift

Online comments emphasize homework volume; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

47 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and test-heavy, while older and an easy grader if you do the homework.

Main concern

Unclear lectures plus hard tests and .

What students said

“ ”
MATH152
“He is one of most amazing professors in Ohlone College.”
MATH181
“ ! You can't understand what he is trying to say.”
MATH188

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections still feel overloaded with and weak instruction, so students often relearn on their own.

Main concern

and unclear teaching can overwhelm students with other hard classes.

What students said

“ . I felt overloaded its about 1300 problems.”
MTH188
“His instruction is very poor quality. He teaches with ambiguity, vagueness, and disorganization.”
MATH188
“Even though he gives a lot of .”
MATH101A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

but are frequently called hard, rushed, or poorly prepared for.

Homework-Based ExamsHard TestsNo Study Guide OftenTime Pressure

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as hard, sometimes covering untaught material, with little review support.

Hard In-Person TestsHomework-Like QuestionsNo Practice Tests Often
“The and confusing. Also does not even provide a study guide.”
ALG152
“ numbers.”
MATH188
“ covered in class”
MATH152

Online

and mostly say tests can be easy while .

Easy Tests MentionedHeavy Homework Prep
“ .”
MTH188
“ .”
MATH101A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Any other math prof is better than him.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting teaching clarity, workload, and . Credibility rating: High.

📉 Teaching Clarity

38/100

“His lectures are extremely unorganized. The ”

📚

26/100

“ .”

👎 Recommendation

28/100

“ !!!!!!!! Any other math prof is better than him.”

⚖️

48/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • doesn't summarize author's method's and just makes up stuff
  • !
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • The and confusing.
  • and ask questions if you have any
  • It's not hard to get an A

Theme 3

❤️ About Classroom Climate

  • He care the most for his students.
  • Also quite rude and discouraging to students.
  • He might make you feel dumb depending on your question

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

55

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across many years and courses give a large, consistent sample despite polarized opinions.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 511
3 out of 54
2 out of 58
1 out of 520

Course coverage

MATH18815 reviews
MATH1529 reviews
MATH101A5 reviews
MATH1814 reviews
CALCULUSA2 reviews
Show 14 more courses
MATH1562 reviews
152061 review
ALG1521 review
MA1531 review
MAT1521 review
MATH1011 review
MATH121 review
MATH1531 review
MATH1661 review
MATH1861 review
MATH1871 review
MATH21 review
MTH1881 review
PRECAL1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 1 · A- 2

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

3

C 2 · C- 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 4