AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Yuan-Yuan Tang

MATH101B · MATH159 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
27.27%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

Avoid unless you can teach yourself calculus and accept .

Best fit · Self Taught ProNo Partial CreditConfusing LecturesTough GraderSelf Taught MathNo Curve
  • and amount to reading the textbook aloud
  • No partial credit and part of a problem
  • A minority report easy As and strong outside help, so experiences sharply split

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

A few students got easy As, but most describe , and D-level averages that make an A costly.

Online has one easy-A review amid many hard complaints; in-person is also split but mostly harsh.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

Average difficulty is high and students say lectures do not clarify the .

Both online and and tests hard.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

68/100

, though some sections mark it yes and participation can unlock small .

as no; and yes.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

27/100

About 27 percent would take again and most detailed comments urge students to stay away.

; a minority of in-person and one online review are positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Repeated no-partial-credit and zero scores.

Format shift

and in-person MATH101B reviews.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Lots of because lectures do not teach effectively.

Format shift

Online and and independent study burden.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Majority describe confusing textbook-style lectures, mistakes in notes, and little help with questions.

Format shift

Negative teaching comments dominate both formats; a few in-person students still call her great and accessible.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

with limited partial credit safety.

Format shift

and in-person comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Split between strong praise for help and and harsh claims of worst teacher, no partial credit, and .

Main concern

No partial credit and curve.

What students said

“Easily the ! On the tests, if you make one mistake on the equation, you get the entire question wrong”
MATH101B
“She is a great Professor. Takes out plenty of time to help her students outside of class.”
MATH159
“Going and honestly a waste of time.”
MATH101B

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Mostly very negative Zoom or online MATH101B reviews citing no partial credit, weak teaching, and ; one easy-A outlier.

Main concern

, and blame on students for .

What students said

“Took her class via Zoom. .”
MATH101B
“No partial credit and no curving :((.”
MATH101B
“Very easy A, but watch out for .”
MATH101B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams give no partial credit and , so one setup error can zero an entire problem.

No Partial CreditNo CurvePop QuizzesRight Or Wrong Only

Assessment risk

Strict

18/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

reported class averages around 60 percent and .

No Partial CreditNo CurveTest Average Around 60%
“if you make one mistake on the equation, you get the entire question wrong even though .”
MATH101B
“Does not give partial credit at ALL which means if you understand problem halfway, its still 0 credit.”
MATH101B
“the class average for test 1 was 60%. ”
MATH101B

Online

Online reviews emphasize no partial credit, no curving, and all-or-nothing quiz and test answers.

No Partial CreditNo CurvePop QuizzesSelf Taught
“Doesn't look at scratch work for quizzes and (no partial credit).”
MATH101B
“No partial credit and no curving :((.”
MATH101B
“Very easy A, but watch out for .”
MATH101B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“By far one of the entire education system. Does not give partial credit at ALL which means if you understand problem halfway, its still 0 credit.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews (5 online, 6 in person), highlighting no partial credit, weak lectures, and a minority of positive outliers. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“Going and honestly a waste of time.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

27/100

“10/10 stay away”

⚖️

15/100

“No partial credit and no curving :((.”

📚

20/100

“Essentially a self-taught class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • she's not great at explaining things and makes a lot of mistakes in her notes.
  • Amazing professor, was not as difficult as I thought

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • No partial credit and no curving :((.
  • class average for test 1 was 60%.
  • Very easy A, but watch out for .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Takes out plenty of time to help her students outside of class.
  • she blames the students for this result
  • Says she is too lazy to answer student's questions in class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews with detailed and consistent criticism of positive experiences.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 57

Course coverage

MATH101B10 reviews
MATH1591 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2