AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Anahid Hassanabadi

MATH156 · STA079711 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid this professor for math unless and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear explanationsSelf-study requiredWorst professorTest heavyConfusing lectures
  • Students say lectures are vague and force full self-teaching
  • Material itself is often manageable, but instructor support is not
  • and withdrawals

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Content can be self-studied for a pass, but poor teaching and .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Several say MATH156 material , but raise the practical difficulty.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Most reviews mark attendance mandatory with participation mattering.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Every reviewer and many call her the .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

; heavy quiz weight and incomplete or drop outcomes signal little safety net.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Weekly homework and but not extreme load if .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Consensus is that , and students must teach themselves.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

70/100

Weekly quizzes and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

All reviews report confusing or vague teaching, pressure to self-study, and .

Main concern

Cannot explain topics clearly; .

What students said

“This professor does . You basically have to teach and learn the material yourself.”
MATH156
“Worst professor at Ohlone. Doesn't teach with understanding and .”
MATH156
“To be honest, she does not know how to teach.”
STA079711

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe heavy weekly quizzes and .

Test heavyWeekly quizzesHeavy quiz weight

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a test-heavy structure.

Weekly quizzesTest heavy30% quiz weightWeekly homework
“ and is due every week (worth 30%). There are quizzes every week which weigh very heavy (30%).”
STA079711
“Material however , but if you need actual help from a teacher to explain.”
MATH156

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This professor does . You basically have to teach and learn the material yourself.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person reviews, highlighting unclear teaching and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Teaching Clarity

12/100

“she does not know how to teach or .”

📚

80/100

“You basically have to teach and learn the material yourself.”

👎 Recommendation

5/100

“ . :(”

📉 Course Outcomes

20/100

“I was forced to drop the class, she does not how how to teach or .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lecturing and communication style are vague and ambiguous.
  • Doesn't teach with understanding and .
  • I've never had a teacher this bad before.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • the material in MATH156 is
  • and is due every week (worth 30%).
  • Material is fairly easy to teach yourself, mostly formulas.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Outcomes

  • Don't recommend this professor for !
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Six recent, highly consistent negative reviews with and teaching-failure claims support medium-high confidence despite small sample size.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH1565 reviews
STA0797111 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 1