AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

Matthew Plicner

COS126 · ESL183RW03 · ESL183 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if , but sample size is small and one review is harshly negative.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyGives Good FeedbackAccessible Outside ClassClear ExamplesParticipation MattersPolarizing Professionalism
  • , and real gains in English or essay writing.
  • He is often accessible outside class and happy to help with questions.
  • One strongly negative review alleges unprofessional phone use and lazy teaching, so experiences vary.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Reported grades around B/B+ with solid work; no free-A claims and content is still effortful.

Both online and with little grade detail.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

ESL and writing work is moderately hard; difficulty ratings cluster around 3-4 without extreme language.

Online and ; little format split on content hardness.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

and participation-heavy; others mark it not mandatory.

; the online review marks attendance not mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

75/100

Three of and English gains despite one harsh outlier.

Online and ; one in-person review strongly does not.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

; grades reported are mid-range with .

Format shift

Sparse grade data across online and in-person; no strong format split.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

, and participation rather than extreme homework volume.

Format shift

Neither format describes an extreme workload.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

, and improvement stories dominate; one review alleges unprofessional classroom behavior.

Format shift

Online review is positive on writing help; in-person reviews are split 2 strong positive, 1 very negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

40/100

ESL and assignments and practice than exam-only grading.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person and ; one older review calls him unprofessional.

Main concern

Unprofessional classroom behavior claim in one review conflicts with .

What students said

“ and he was always happy to help with questions and problems.”
ESL183
“Profesor Plicner was devoted to the class and helped everyone in any question.”
ESL183RW03
“Not a professional teacher! In class time , he always play phone game”
ESL183

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Single online review says his approach helped the student start writing essays and rates him positively.

Main concern

Only one online review, so .

What students said

“Matt Plicner teaching approach really helped me .”
COS126

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews say little about exam format; , and writing practice.

Limited exam detailWriting-focused workFeedback-heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews emphasize lectures and ; .

Lecture and feedback focused
“He helped me greatly improve my English ability.”
ESL183

Online

.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and he was always happy to help with questions and problems.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews (1 online, 3 in-person), highlighting support versus one conduct complaint. Credibility rating: Medium.

📝

72/100

“Matt Plicner teaching approach really helped me .”

🤝

75/100

“Profesor Plicner was devoted to the class and helped everyone in any question.”

⚠️ Polarizing Conduct

25/100

“Not a professional teacher! In class time , he always play phone game”

👍 Recommendation

75/100

“He helped me greatly improve my English ability.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Plicner had a good lecture style, I enjoyed his class!
  • he don't talk about any textbook article, just go over the answer

Theme 2

❤️ About Support & Character

  • he was always happy to help with questions and problems
  • devoted to the class and helped everyone in any question
  • Accessible outside class

Theme 3

📈 About Outcomes

  • He helped me greatly improve my English ability.
  • really helped me .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Only four reviews with mixed tone and limited grade detail; one online and .

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ESL1832 reviews
COS1261 review
ESL183RW031 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values